One
of the cool things that I can relate to about Barack Obama is that he's a
comics fan. A collector, even.
(More
here from Tony
Norman and this story about our first presidential
nerd.
Even more cool: he's a Spock fan. Spock, of course, was also coolly detached in
the face of irrational human hatred and bigotry. You be the judge...)
The above is one of his doodles that sold at auction. But does
it compare to the king of doodling Robert Crumb? You be the judge....
Three
vids about Obama:
First, from the Obama channel. I guess I should subscribe to
that. Let's hope this works.
But what does Mumia think of Obama? Really.
And is Obama a House Negro?
Probably. But this is the White House. You could do a lot of good for black
folks and the entire country as a whole from this particular house. Related:
This is more good news: It looks like
Obama has taken the Van
Jones script word for word.
Nov. 18
Re: Lieberman Or Why We Need A
"Viable" 3rd Party
This
is something I've cross posted to various blogs. It's a longer response that
explains if you're really mad at the Lieberman wrist slap, if that, then you
need to think about funding and supporting viable third party runs.
Here's the poll:
Poll
We should put pressure on Dem Leaders by:
8%
3
votes
5%
2
votes
75%
27
votes
11%
4
votes
| 36 votes
I read with some
interest the mean things that Markos said about Ralph Nader, arguably the
greatest journalist who has ever lived. I voted for Barack Obama but with eyes
wide open. I think he'll be better and more sensible than the Republicans in
power. But we really need to take a deeper look at our loyalty to the democratic
party and the democratic party only if we're really serious about things like
the rule of law applying to everyone or even getting out of wars that would be
more honestly defined as crimes. In short: if you really want to put the fear of
god into Democrats, then you need to start supporting third party candidates.
This crazy idea that we just keep giving them more money no matter how horribly
they treat us simply isn't beginning to fly anymore.
First, we need to take an honest look at the questions of electing democrats
versus progressive policy. It's clear that if you look at the last several years
we've been successful at electing democrats. It's also very clear that we've
failed miserably to enact progressive laws, get our people into offices that
matter and in some cases we've even failed to ensure some fairly common sense
conservative rules that we believe in like: the rule of law applies to everyone
or shouldn't democrats support the party's nominee? Crazy ideas like that. So we
might have a situation where Howard Dean has no role in the current
administration but Joe Lieberman does! This is why we work hard for Democrats? I
would hope not.
Two, why does the DNC establishment continuously fuck us over? Glenn
Greenwald outlines the reality of our situation.
It is worth remembering that the Democrats who are going to exert dominant
political control are the same ones who have provoked so much scorn --
rightfully so -- over the last several years, and particularly since 2006.
This is the same Democratic Party leadership which funded the Iraq War
without conditions (and voted to authorize it in the first place); massively
expanded the President's warrantless eavesdropping powers; immunized
lawbreaking telecoms; enacted the Patriot Act and then renewed it with
virtually no changes; didn't even bother to mount a filibuster to stop the
Military Commissions Act; refrained from pursuing any meaningful
investigations of Bush lawbreaking; confirmed every last extremist Bush
nominee, from Michael McConnell to Michael Mukasey; acquiesced to even the
worst and most lawless Bush policies when they were briefed on them; and on
and on and on. None of that has changed. That is still who they are. Joe
Lieberman didn't merely campaign against Barack Obama and several other
Democrats. That's the least of his sins. He was not only among the most
vocal supporters of the Iraq War, but at least as bad, has endorsed and
supported every last radical Bush policy to expand executive power and
surveillance activities while destroying core constitutional liberties and
checks and balances. He used his Chairmanship for only one purpose: to block
oversight into Bush scandals and corruption. He has spouted the most
defamatory attacks, not only against Barack Obama, but against war opponents
generally. More significantly still, Democrats in his own state -- his own
constituents -- booted him out of the party, no longer wanting to be
represented by him.
Remember the arrogance of that Obama turnaround on FISA? Well, the answer is,
under the current Daily Kos construction, we have no where else to turn. What
else can we do? "Where else can you dirty fucking internet beatnik hippies
go? Just give me some more money and shut the fuck up," Obama might as well
have said. He'll probably say something like that a lot during the next four
years. Obama will probably do things that any sensible person would never equate
with real "change".
Here are the Markos rules as far as I can figure them out: We support the
democrats no matter what they do. We don't support Republicans, which I think is
smart because they're an evil party (there shouldn't be a party that represents
private interests against the greater good at every fucking turn) but we also
don't support third party candidates who would better represent us. Further, we
won't expend any energy into building viable third party candidates and/or well
funded well organized third party runs. Now, to me, those last two facts, the
reality that we don't support third party candidates or will work to build a
viable third party infrastructure, doom us to irrelevance. This is why we lose.
I might stress that this is also why we will continue to lose. They simply don't
fear us. Finally, this Markos construction is a boon to the Republicans. I can
very easily see a scenario where the republicans stop all meaningful
reform/stimulus over the next two years, declare all dem efforts "fails" and
make big gains in 2010.
Three: What is a viable third party run?You don't need a 50
state plan, at least initially, to prove our point to the democrats. You really
need to focus on what I've been calling my 5/25 plan. You need to fund 25 house
races and 5 senate races. You need at least 1 million dollars to compete for a
house seat and at least 2 million to compete, realistically and viably for a
senate seat. Now, this is where the expertise of the Kos community could come in
handy. What 25 house seats would you pick to make your point? I frankly think
they should run "Lieberman" style. Run them in the primary first and even if
they lose run them in the general. We already have two senate opportunities in
Delaware and Illinois for 2010. Tom Morello has openly talked about dipping his
toe into the political waters in Illinois. I actually wouldn't mind Ralph Nader
as a Delaware senator because I think he would use the filibuster. The truth of
the matter is that five senators that use the old fashioned Jimmy Stewart
filibuster could change congress. Just once, I'd like to see a senator as
supportive of child healthcare as they are for wall street bailouts. I'd love to
see a senator talk about that over a several day fillibuster as well. (You would
need a stubborn asshole to do that...Nader looks right to me...)
Finally, if you like being disappointed by the dems, then don't keep your
third party options open. Just keep giving them money and clap harder. I might
note that both David Sirota and Glenn Greenwald have organizations in place that
could start searching for and funding viable third party runs and candidates.
It's clear that's what they're thinking. Feel free to steal my 5/25 plan and
start real change. That would make the dems take notice. Primary challenges
aren't going to do it. Most of these guys look at "public service" as an
audition for "K Street" anyway...Time to try some new ideas.
Nov. 16
A Relaxed I'm Not Worried About
Being Sent To A Camp for Opposing the Iranian War Weekend Around the Internets
Yet
another strip that will never ever get syndication. (And in some
countries the cartoonist gets hanged or imprisoned or both...) But its funny.
It's called Jesus and Mo.
Khari
Mosely tipped me off to this guy some weeks weeks ago: His name is Van Jones.
He's got a great plan to create millions of green jobs and his environmental
plans would create millions of jobs in the inner city. I suppose I'm hoping that
this is the kind of talented African American that an African American President
might notice. You never know. His
Green For All blog is here and
I've added it separately and also to the host of many good eco blogs out there.
"Someone once said racism is
like cancer," Ferris said. "It's never totally wiped out, it's in
remission."
If so, America's remission lasted until the morning of Nov. 5.
The day after the vote hailed as a sign of a nation changed, black high
school student Barbara Tyler of Marietta, Ga., said she heard hateful Obama
comments from white students, and that teachers cut off discussion about
Obama's victory.
Tyler spoke at a press conference by the Georgia chapter of the NAACP
calling for a town hall meeting to address complaints from across the state
about hostility and resentment. Another student, from a Covington middle
school, said he was suspended for wearing an Obama shirt to school Nov. 5
after the principal told students not to wear political paraphernalia.
The student's mother, Eshe Riviears, said the principal told her: "Whether
you like it or not, we're in the South, and there are a lot of people who
are not happy with this decision."
Other incidents include:
_Four North Carolina State University students admitted writing anti-Obama
comments in a tunnel designated for free speech expression, including one
that said: "Let's shoot that (N-word) in the head." Obama has received more
threats than any other president-elect, authorities say.
_At Standish, Maine, a sign inside the Oak Hill General Store read: "Osama
Obama Shotgun Pool." Customers could sign up to bet $1 on a date when Obama
would be killed. "Stabbing, shooting, roadside bombs, they all count," the
sign said. At the bottom of the marker board was written "Let's hope someone
wins."
_Racist graffiti was found in places
including New York's Long Island, where two dozen cars were spray-painted;
Kilgore, Texas, where the local high school and skate park were defaced; and
the Los Angeles area, where swastikas, racial slurs and "Go Back To
Africa"
were spray painted on sidewalks, houses and cars. _Second- and third-grade
students on a school bus in Rexburg, Idaho, chanted "assassinate Obama," a
district official said.
_University of Alabama professor Marsha L. Houston said a poster of the
Obama family was ripped off her office door. A replacement poster was
defaced with a death threat and a racial slur. "It seems the election
brought the racist rats out of the woodwork," Houston said.
_Black figures were hanged by nooses from trees on Mount Desert Island,
Maine, the Bangor Daily News reported. The president of Baylor University in
Waco, Texas said a rope found hanging from a campus tree was apparently an
abandoned swing and not a noose.
_Crosses were burned in yards of Obama supporters in Hardwick, N.J., and
Apolacan Township, Pa.
_A black teenager in
New
York
City
said he was attacked with a bat on election night by four white men who
shouted 'Obama.'
_In the Pittsburgh suburb of Forest Hills, a black man said he found a note
with a racial slur on his car windshield, saying "now that you voted for
Obama, just watch out for your house."
Emotions are often raw after a hard-fought political campaign, but now those
on the losing side have an easy target for their anger.
"The principle is very simple," said BJ Gallagher, a sociologist and
co-author of the diversity book "A Peacock in the Land of Penguins." "If I
can't hurt the person I'm angry at, then I'll vent my anger on a substitute,
i.e., someone of the same race."
"We saw the same thing happen after the 9-11 attacks, as a wave of
anti-Muslim violence swept the country. We saw it happen after the Rodney
King verdict, when Los Angeles blacks erupted in rage at the injustice
perpetrated by 'the white man.'"
"It's as stupid and ineffectual as kicking your dog when you've had a bad
day at the office," Gallagher said. "But it happens a lot."
Nov. 13
This
is sort of what I look like if you were to highly embellish my portrait with
cheap Photoshop effects. It's a definite improvement over real life. Its a self
portrait.
Nov 12
A Very Late And Lazy Around the
Internets Because I Can't Believe We Elected An African American President
Dream
fake New York Times. People actually handed these papers out...What's a
maximum wage law?
In
case you didn't know what's wrong with the Democrats: We actually have to fight
to get Joe Lieberman off Homeland
Security. Incredible.
I'm
one of those American losers that has no health insurance. Somewhat related: I
also happen to hate auto insurance because I have to buy it. There's nobody
making sure that auto insurance is affordable in the United States. Your state
insurance commission is supposed to regulate them but...well, they really
don't. They're about as accountable as the Public Utility Commission. You would
know how worthless these organizations are if your sad ass excuse for a
mainstream media ever did any reporting on them. Or: those GEICO ads buy more
than just branding. So, would I like my health insurance to be just like my auto
insurance? No. I'm learning all this
here and
here.
Health care will be the first battle of the new administration. (Quick
Nightmarish future illustration: You'll be lucky to take home 1000 a month with
your mcservice job. 300 or more of it will have to go
toward paying your health insurance. It's your fault don't you know.)
Editorial confession: I no longer own a car. Thank Gawd for Car Sharing.
Three bucks an hour and I don't pay any insurance or for gas.
Why
Richard Dawkins
is a
Mean Old Atheist. She probably had it coming. Jesus sez so. No wait, sorry.
Allah. Related:
Mormons,Mormons,
and
Mormons. They hate the gay love. Jesus sez so. He's also Kewl with the
multiple wives. Mostest Related: Hitchens on the unsavory history of the
Mormon Church here and
here. Quick version:
Running a church makes you rich and gets you laid, preferably with lots of hot
young wives. Jesus sez so.
Or L. Ron Hubbard.
Realistic
assessment of Obama, who I voted for just so we're clear, by Danny Glover below.
I actually met him once. Have to tell that story later. He's definitely a cool
guy.
A Paranoid's Look At A Possible Stolen Election
By
any objective measurement, it should be a blowout for Obama today. By any
realistic measurement, and in light of what some of us think are the Republican
presidential steals of 2000 and 2004, we could be looking at yet another stolen
presidential election. The good news: it should be really really hard to steal
this election. It would be so obvious that even the Mainstream Media and the
Daily Kos would notice. Frankly, I'm hoping that the election thieves were
ordered to stand down after their masters looked closely at their shrinking
stock portfolios. The Bad News: Ker Razy Christian Fundamentalists have been
pinpointed as the master hackers. They're not in the reality based worlds. The
only way they could win is to turnaround elections in DNC strongholds but it
could still work. Obama didn't even ask for a recount in New Hampshire where he
could have possibly proven fraud. If he doesn't question dicey results today,
we're screwed. Everything would depend on a Green Party, Ralph Nader recount. I
know they would have the balls to do that. But we would have to fund them.
First, here's the Markos prediction. In a
fair world where the machines work or where the deficit is simply too big to
steal believably, this is what should happen given Obama's superior ground game
and early voting advantage.
Now, given the reality of what's happened over the last decade
years, this is a map (below)
of what kinds of voting machines are in which states. If I was an election
stealer, then I would put all my resources into stealing states that are either
orange or red. These states have no paper record of your vote. Some of them have
internal audits but they'll simply reflect the stolen vote totals so they're
worthless.
Again, if I was a thief, I'd take a good look at Pennsylvania
and New Jersey. Just for fun, I used one of the free construct your own
electoral vote counters from the Internets. This is what I concluded would
happen if they steal states that they could easily steal. You might note that
even if they were to steal Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where no records or no
audits exists, as far as I know, Obama could still win. One note: Florida
switched to paper ballots so they're all green now. I hope.
My prediction below:
Now, here's where the Big Fat Steal could occur: all along the
Eastern seaboard. I would go after Delaware and Maryland. Untraceable. A
perfect crime. You would have to go to court and ask for new paper ballot
elections. You would be under the 2000 timetable gun. You would have to win in
Republican courts. The public would have to buy that Obama lost in four states
where he was up by 10 points or more but more than likely the MSM would be fine
with it. ("Joe the Plumber struck a chord" or some bullshit like that...) Again,
astonishing I agree. But possible. How crazy are Right Wing Christian
Fundamentalist Pro Life hackers? That's not an answer I'm comfortable with.
Here' the thing: Even if Obama wins this is a terrible system. You can leave
your money out on the street overnight. It might be there in morning. But that
doesn't mean that this is a good banking system. Ditto for our voting machine
architectures. The whole country should be green with paper ballots and random
mandatory audits. One more depressing note: you can steal elections in the green
and blue areas too, but its much harder and it should be discovered by way of
recounts
Oct. 31
Scary
New Yorker Cover above. Boo, indeed. And the friendly faces of America below:
You know, I had never really thought about this one aspect of
Obama's run. I always knew that by running for president Obama was putting his
own life and his family's life in danger. That's his choice and perhaps the risk
is worth it, especially if I get reparations. I want my 40 acres and a mule. On
Mars, preferably. But
after this story broke it has just occurred to me that Obama's run will put
every black person in the United States in danger. Apparently, Obama has had
pretty good protection so far. However, I suppose frustrated white racists will
just pick other African American targets, who probably won't have secret
service protection. Oh well. There probably will be casualties. I hope the
sacrifice is worth it. Personally speaking: I will certainly try to kill anyone
who tries to kill me. I feel that's the least that I can do. And as for Ashley
Todd you say she has a history of mental problems and is a McCain/Palin
supporter, perhaps even organizer? And I should be surprised...? In what way
precisely?
Oct. 30
Where
can you put half hour ads cheaply? On the Internets. I voted early and I voted
for that one.
If
you want to get involved in this, you need to vote early so you can be available
on election day. That's what I intend to do. It would be nice if the Daily Kos
did an exit poll as well. It's almost like they don't want to know. Probably
because they don't. I'll say it again: The Daily Kos silence on the election
fraud issue (By way of bannings. How progressive..), which caused the DNC losses
in both 2000 and 2004, is deafening and makes me think Markos took that CIA
offer back in college.
Help
Needed for November 4 Election Verification Exit Poll
The vulnerability of US voting systems to
mass scale fraud has been well documented, but little has been done to
establish meaningful checks. Bad as the last few elections have been, coming
elections - including this one - could be worse. Purported "improvements" such
as
early and mail-voting and
purging
of voting rolls continue to undermine election integrity and a wide
variety of
vote
suppression augurs poorly for what we may see on November 4.
One of the few
ways to detect mass scale fraud under such conditions is an
Election Verification Exit Poll. Such polls have been used around the
world to ensure election integrity and have been used to
overturn fraudulent national elections. On
November 4, Election Integrity
is engaged in a two-part exit polling effort:
(1) Our
3rd professional poll to determine and
document the degree to which official numbers reflect how people say they
have cast their ballots, to investigate any discrepancies and to establish
exit polling as a meaningful verification technique
(see our May primary pilot project). (2) a Citizens
Exit Poll with the
Election Defense Alliance to: · extend our ability to ascertain the
veracity of official reported voting results; · detect specific indications of
election fraud, which can be further investigated; · develop citizen polling as a means to
detect and deter fraud; and · give citizens the tools to take
control of their elections and their government.
To properly prosecute these efforts,
we need your help. In the
end, simply pushing a button for one name or another every few years will
inevitably be an empty charade. Self-government or, for that matter,
good-government, can only result from active involvement and oversight.
So please,
volunteer or
donate. Democracy depends on
it.
This
is from Bradblog. Here's the shocker: The NAACP is suing the Democratic
Governor and the Democratic Sec. of State (I think he's a dem.) over supplying
emergency paper ballots at Pennsylvania polling stations. They have to do this
after Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004? Oh wait, it gets better. The Republican Party
filed a brief with Rendell and against the NAACP! Remember: if you want to
elect Barack Obama you want to discourage long lines and help inner city voters,
especially if the machines break down. Why is Ed Rendell on the other side? Of
course, after Florida 2000, why would Rendell and the Pennsylvania Sec. of State
give us nothing but DRE's without a paper ballot in site? You might as well hand
the election to
fundamentalist Christian hackers.
While the work my colleague Steve Rosenfeld
did in putting some of the DNC folks on record here is to be commended, a
closer examination of the comments and documents reported from Justin
Levitt, the DNC's National Voter Protection Counsel, offer a lot of
distracting smoke, and little, if any, actual substance to back up the
claims made that, as Levitt is quoted, "Our election protection effort,
including our e-voting team, are prepared to respond rapidly and
effectively to issues as they arise, including any issues involving
technology."
While there is evidence to back
up the claims of some of the limited efforts made to stop some of the GOP
voter suppression efforts in MI and MT, for example, there is absolutely
no evidence offered to substantiate the claim Levitt makes that the DNC or
the Obama campaign is "responding in real-time" to the many issues of
voting machine failures now being reported in a number of states,
including WV, TN, TX, MO, NV and elsewhere.
He claims, in the report, that Obama/DNC
attorneys are "often behind the scenes, but always active." That assertion
mirrors similar ones I've received from other higher-ups in the DNC
election protection hierarchy. But with each such claim, I continue to ask
for evidence to back up that "behind the scenes" work and have, to date,
been given none. To the contrary, all evidence that I have been
able to gather demonstrates that precisely nothing is being done,
at least when it comes to the concerns about the wholly unverifiable
electronic voting machines being used to count approximately one third of
the votes that will be cast this year.
The NAACP has even been forced to go to
court to sue the Democratic
Secretary of the Commonwealth in PA, after he decreed that paper
ballots only need be given out if every machine in a precinct
breaks down. The Obama/DNC team did nothing for more than a month, until
the NAACP finally had to sue last week, and the Republicans joined the
Democratic state officials in fighting the suit to require paper ballots
if just a majority of machines break down (as so many did during
PA's primary, disenfranchising countless thousands).
I'm pleased to see that the DNC has
created a database of jurisdictions, equipment used, security procedures
and laws in each of the thousands of counties, cities and townships in the
country, as I had recommended when
addressing their lead attorneys
on these very issues at the DNC's 2006 summer meeting in Chicago.
I have little doubt that their efforts,
and their "thousands of attorneys", are an improvement over similarly
lacking efforts by John Kerry and the DNC in 2004. Nonetheless, until
actual evidence is offered --- any evidence --- to back up the claims of
the super-secret, behind-the-scenes effort in what should be a 100%
transparent democracy, you'll pardon me if I remain not just exceedingly
skeptical, but downright furious at the party's brazen willingness to
allow millions of votes to go either uncounted, incorrectly recorded, or
recorded in such a way that is 100% unverifiable by any human being.
Rosenfeld quotes from a DNC memo which
asserts, among other things, that "We've been monitoring voting machines
to ensure that they record the vote accurately."
Well, that's swell, but I'd love to know
how they are able to monitor that even a single vote, ever cast on
any Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting
machine is being "accurately" recorded. I would love a single piece of
evidence to prove that any vote, ever cast on such a device
--- with or without a so-called "paper trail" sometimes attached to it ---
has ever been recorded accurately during any election, for
any candidate or initiative on the ballot. As I'm sure Levitt
knows, no such evidence exists. To suggest otherwise is an insult to their
voters, and to all voters.
To make matters worse, those same 100%
unverifiable voting machines are now
losing votes entirely and
flipping untold others from Democratic candidates to Republican candidates
and others in state after state. (Just a few examples can be found
here,
here,
here, here, and
here. I have many more that
I've not yet been able to report due to time constraints.)
Those failed machines have not
been removed from use, are still dangerously imperiling the
accurate votes of millions, and ultimately, even if they worked as they
are supposed to work, could never be verified as having accurately
recorded even a single voters' intent as they desired.
The voters of this country ---
Democratic, Republican, independent and everything else --- deserve far
better from both major parties. But to suggest that we, the people,
would be impressed, if only we were allowed to know the secret efforts
being taken on our behalf by the Democratic Party, is an insult not only
to Democrats, but to every American voter.
Got evidence of the work being done to
ensure electronic vote counts are accurate, and that every voter matters
this year? Please share it with us. Believe me, I'd be delighted to
report that evidence at The BRAD BLOG,
as I take no joy in being as critical as I have been forced to be about
the Obama/DNC's lacking efforts on election protection, particularly given
the out-and-out brazen efforts at all-out voter suppression by the GOP.
But until any such evidence is actually
forthcoming, and while I've been receiving reports from some of those
"thousands of attorneys" in the Obama/DNC attorney corps telling me what
little efforts are being done, and until the claims that "we are on it"
stop being countered by actual reported evidence on the ground,
such claims are no more impressive or believable than George W. Bush's
assertions over the last 6 years that "the War in Iraq is a great
success," or that Brownie was doing "a heckuva job" down in New Orleans.
The DNC owes me nothing. If they don't
wish to share the evidence with me, they don't have to. But they do
owe their voters and supporters something more than smoke and mirrors.
And, so far, the evidence for the claims made in the article above remain
nowhere to be found --- just like the DNC attorneys and action on behalf
of voters in counties where votes continue to flip or are being lost
entirely.
===
Brad Friedman is a nationally
recognized journalistic expert on issues of election integrity, and the
creator and editor of The BRAD BLOG (www.BradBlog.com).
He also writes on these issues at the UK's Guardian, ComputerWorld,
AlterNet and elsewhere, and has been invited to testify to the U.S.
Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) and to other election officials and
body around the country. More bio info
here.
Weekend Around the Internets
The
Atheist movement uses
Adbusters-style counterpropaganda. Could that work? That would be funny here
in Pittsburgh. I can see the ads being defaced. Related: Agent Ska, my
fake virtual 13 year old girlfriend who seems, well, horny
here and
here, came out as a Bright some weeks ago. And I suppose if one were horny
getting out of the Catholic Church would be the way to go.
So up come the sunday
mornings when someone who still goes will look around and say, "Does anyone
else want to go with me [to church]?" I look down and wish I had cereal to
stare down at. I don't want to go. I don't consider myself religious or
Catholic. So I stare and wait for this moment to end
On the other hand, as someone who wrote things in college
that professors didn't like, not sure I would mention that if I went to a
Catholic University. Everyone has to clap harder for Tinkerbell or else! Gutsy
post. Watch your back. Watch your friendly "teachers".
Funny
Tom the Dancing Bug toon that the City Paper can no longer afford. That last
quote from the "Paid for by the Committee for Desperate Attempts to Use
Joe-Based Archetypes to Put a Common Folksy Face on Policies that Greatly Favor
Only the Extremely Wealthy" is so on the mark.
Oct. 21
Tom
the Dancing Bug on those "Lucky Duckys". Related: More
from Digby.
I'll
have more to say about this fake ACORN scandal later tonight. But here's the
truth from Keith Olbermann. Related: From Greg Palast
"The Theft of 2008".
Oct. 17 PST
I
recently bought a refurbished computer with a quad core chip with 3 gig of ram.
It's supposed to be faster and it is. This is a test post.
I
haven't written in about a week but I have been thinking. Obama is way ahead in
the polls. This would be a great thing had the Republicans not used every method
in the book to steal the last two presidential elections. For example, several
states that Obama is leading are all run by Republican Secretaries of State,
most notably Michigan and Colorado, which brings us back to the Ken
Blackwell/Katherine Harris scenarios. Obama is leading in Florida but as far as
I can tell there's nothing that's been passed at the federal level that would
prevent thousands of Democratic Party votes from being stolen, again. There is a
bright spot in Ohio because they elected a progressive Secretary of State in
Ohio. The Republicans are attempting to strip about 200000 voters from the Ohio
registration list. I'm going to guess that they come from mostly DNC
strongholds. However, as I've been watching and learning from various voter's
rights group our very own Pennsylvania is very likely to be stolen because in
most precincts there simply won't be a paper record. In fact, in arguably the
most important precincts in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia--where Obama needs to
roll up big majorities in order to beat the bible belt T that makes up the rest
of the state--the machines leave no paper trail. Its not unlike going to the
robber and asking him to be honest about robbing you. You won't be able to
verify it. If we lose Pennsylvania, then let's make sure we thank Dan Onorato,
Ed Rendell and the Philly machine.
I think that's why McCain thinks
Pennsylvania is
more promising than Michigan. Pennsylvania is one of the easiest states in
the nation to steal. Obama almost has to win by a landslide nationally in order
to win at all. Of course, what do you say about a DNC that doesn't pass a single
bill in the last two years in order to change the equation? They could have
mandated paper trails and audits but they did nothing. I think you call them
collaborators. Or
people who like proxy wars on behalf of Israel. Or
DLC
members. Or clueless. Or all of the above.
Anyway, that's the sad state of affairs as
far as I can tell. Can Obama get enough votes to beat the fix?
Sounds depressing.
But Greg Palast and great alt cartoonists Ted Rall and Lloyd Dangle have written
a 24 page comic telling you how to fight back. You can download the comic as
a pdf file for a donation as small as a dollar. That's what I did. Palast,
arguably one of the best journalists in the United States (Who, of course, you
can only find online for the most part and who doesn't work for an American
newspaper. Sigh.) needs the funding so that he can continue to do cutting edge
reporting. You can find his seven instructions both above and below this post.
Related: You can find a nice update on these issues from
this episode of Democracy
Now.
Oct. 13
A
while back, as I was buying comics at the
Oakland Phantom of the Attic, I found myself in an argument--totally out of
the blue--with novelist Wayne Wise
about computers and the future of comics. He seemed to think that the Internet
was some kind of threat to brick and mortar comics stores. I didn't think much
of his argument at the time but then I started to notice the mystery of the
disappearing music store. Does anybody remember the National Record Mart? Just a
handful of music stores left now in Pittsburgh. Replaced by Amazon and let's
face it: torrent sites. I didn't think that could happen to comics but I'm
beginning to think differently.
I say that because I really kind of enjoy
the
Watchmen Motion Comics. These are comics with some rudimentary flash
enabled animation plus all the dialogue voiced out. I really enjoyed the first
one. The second one came out which is a complete read through of Issue 2,
arguably one of the best written comics ever made. You can't buy these motion
comics at Phantom of the Attic. You can only download them at Itunes. And the
price is right: $1.99. That's actually cheaper than most comics and you get
movement and vocal work. If they did the same for the other completely superior
Alan Moore books, say Promethea, Top Ten, Tom Strong and the League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen, then I would buy them as well. And, yes, I suppose, if
you offered comics this way what would we need with a brick and mortar comic
book store, my 20 bucks a month notwithstanding. Perhaps Wayne was right about
being annoyed.
One complaint about the voiceover work in
the first two issues is that they have this one guy doing all the voiceover
work. He's okay with male characters. His women don't sound convincing at all.
One person seemed to think his female characters sounds like
Dr. Girlfriend of the Venture Brothers. There was a long delay between the
first and second issues and we were hoping that poor Warner Brothers could hire
a girl. Or even more than just that one guy who does the voiceover work. But
apparently Warner Brothers can't afford it. I guess this is why we no longer
have music on your so called music channels. (See
related Harlan Ellison rant.) Related:
Robert Kirkman's Invincible is also going down the motion path via MTV.
Their animation isn't as good but it looks like they hired a girl to voice the
girl parts. How innovative. Invincible is a very very disturbing comic
book by the way. Without giving the plot away: You remember how there are people
who think Superman is some kind of alien threat, well...
What Should Have Been Posted
October 5
And
now for a scary pre Halloween treat:
First up, Naomi Wolf says Fascism is
coming. You can find some
disturbing history where she describes the warning signs of fascism. The
video below is where she tells you its here. She references three disturbing
things that have happened in the past week or so. One) The placement of an
American military brigade on American soil (here
and here)
which will be used to do the same kinds of civic things they're doing in Iraq,
or death squad/torturer activity. Enjoy. Here's the thing about
The Shock Doctrine: we're
shocked because we don't see it coming. Not so much the people who create the
shock...what will it be this time he wonders aloud...How about a bank crash? "We
can't have elections now can we...?" Two) The Bailout Bill, which, and I don't
care how reassuring Barry's calls to push that bailout, shouldn't have been
signed because nobody read that. Never sign contracts that you haven't read.
It's a rule I go by and has served me well. Never sign a contract that you've
read but don't fully understand. Yet another rule to live by. Congress broke
both of those rules. Three) And, this is under reported, martial law was
threatened if people that wanted to read and fully understand the bill voted no.
Now, it could have been martial law that would have been caused by a run on the
banks or it could have been something else. Hey, there's an army brigade on
American soil! That can't possibly go wrong...
Anyway. Naomi says she's scared. And, hey,
after watching this, I'm scared too. I'm getting a passport. Not sure where we'd
run if the Nazis control the most powerful military in the world but have to
think positive...
Sept.
30
I
get the occasional news announcement. I may attend over the phone and maybe
write about this tomorrow. You never know.
NEW REPORT REVEALS
MCCAIN
HEALTH PLAN WILL RAISE TAXES, TAKE AWAY PENNSYLVANIANS’ HEALTH CARE
Coalition to Release
State Numbers, Take Action to Raise Awareness
Independent Analysis Shows Wide-Spread Loss of
Benefits, Increase in Taxes for Millions
CONTACT:
Michael Morrill,
Keystone Progress,
(610)
568-0937
HARRISBURG, PA – With ordinary Americans increasingly struggling under
the combined impact of the banking and health care crises, the Center for
American Progress Action Fund is preparing to release a report detailing how
the McCain health care plan
would increase the burden on middle-class families in
Pennsylvania. The report, which will be released Wednesday at a
joint press conference held by Change to Win, Keystone Progress, and
the
Service Employees International Union (SEIU),
will detail the number of Pennsylvanians expected to lose employer-sponsored
health insurance under
John McCain’s health care plan. It also
details the tax hike middle
class families would experience over four years under John McCain’s
health care plan.
Center for American Progress Action Fund Senior Health Policy Analyst
Ellen-Marie Whelan will
discuss what the McCain health plan means for Pennsylvania.
Who:
Ellen-Marie Whelan, Senior Health Policy Analyst, Center for American Progress
With
participation from Change to Win, Keystone Progress, and SEIU Pennsylvania
What:
Press Conference to Release Report on Effects on McCain Health Plan on
Pennsylvania
When: Wednesday, October 1,
2008 at 12:30 PM
Where: Via conference
call. RSVP to info@keystoneprogress.org
for call-in number and access code. Full white paper will be provided on
Wednesday morning, embargoed until 12:30 PM.
Live in the Capitol Rotunda at 2:00 PM
What Should Have Been Posted
Sept 26
Here's
the newest version of the Acid Jazz Channel that features the newest adds. The
band in the graphic is called Little Dragon. Over several thousand videos. Also
seen here but
bigger.
You
know, McCain could have chosen Christine Todd Whitman. She's a fine looking
woman who is qualified to be president and isn't a fucking nutcase who speaks
in tongues. Just sayin'....Go Obama! And what's with that dreary inarticulate
sax solo. That guy's playing makes me feel like I'm in Hell...
Vote for Obama: He's less likely to send private Blackwater death squads to
kill you in your sleep. And two: doesn't seem to have a vice presidential
candidate who speaks in tongues and would find thermonuclear war a pretty good
option because this whole life thing is just a minor stage before heaven and
most likely for you heathens a burning eternal fiery Hell. Go Obama!
I
get the occasional news announcement. I may attend over the phone and maybe
write about this tomorrow. You never know.
NEW REPORT REVEALS
MCCAIN
HEALTH PLAN WILL RAISE TAXES, TAKE AWAY PENNSYLVANIANS’ HEALTH CARE
Coalition to Release
State Numbers, Take Action to Raise Awareness
Independent Analysis Shows Wide-Spread Loss of
Benefits, Increase in Taxes for Millions
CONTACT:
Michael Morrill,
Keystone Progress,
(610)
568-0937
HARRISBURG, PA – With ordinary Americans increasingly struggling under
the combined impact of the banking and health care crises, the Center for
American Progress Action Fund is preparing to release a report detailing how
the McCain health care plan
would increase the burden on middle-class families in
Pennsylvania. The report, which will be released Wednesday at a
joint press conference held by Change to Win, Keystone Progress, and
the
Service Employees International Union (SEIU),
will detail the number of Pennsylvanians expected to lose employer-sponsored
health insurance under
John McCain’s health care plan. It also
details the tax hike middle
class families would experience over four years under John McCain’s
health care plan.
Center for American Progress Action Fund Senior Health Policy Analyst
Ellen-Marie Whelan will
discuss what the McCain health plan means for Pennsylvania.
Who:
Ellen-Marie Whelan, Senior Health Policy Analyst, Center for American Progress
With
participation from Change to Win, Keystone Progress, and SEIU Pennsylvania
What:
Press Conference to Release Report on Effects on McCain Health Plan on
Pennsylvania
When: Wednesday, October 1,
2008 at 12:30 PM
Where: Via conference
call. RSVP to info@keystoneprogress.org
for call-in number and access code. Full white paper will be provided on
Wednesday morning, embargoed until 12:30 PM.
Live in the Capitol Rotunda at 2:00 PM
What Should Have Been Posted
Sept 26
Here's
the newest version of the Acid Jazz Channel that features the newest adds. The
band in the graphic is called Little Dragon. Over several thousand videos. Also
seen here but
bigger.
You
know, McCain could have chosen Christine Todd Whitman. She's a fine looking
woman who is qualified to be president and isn't a fucking nutcase who speaks
in tongues. Just sayin'....Go Obama! And what's with that dreary inarticulate
sax solo. That guy's playing makes me feel like I'm in Hell...
Vote for Obama: He's less likely to send private Blackwater death squads to
kill you in your sleep. And two: doesn't seem to have a vice presidential
candidate who speaks in tongues and would find thermonuclear war a pretty good
option because this whole life thing is just a minor stage before heaven and
most likely for you heathens a burning eternal fiery Hell. Go Obama!
Three, given that the dems cave on
everything,
Digby articulates the nightmare scenario of the Dems and Obama okaying the
bailout with little public good or oversight and being portrayed, somewhat
legitimately if they pass anything near the Paulson plan, as the party of
privileged wall street elites.
Four, in a case of really good online
reporting, Chris Bowers gives us two
anonymous emails from an unnamed congressperson who uses the word "fuck" and
tells us how Dem House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will get steam rollered. Thanks to
those Blue Dogs.
Five, but not least, Greenwald has a great
perspective onthis
here and
here. Related: More from
Greider,
Krugman and I wish Max Sawicky was still writing something...how about
Dean Baker?
Better than most of what you will get in
newspapers as to what exactly the "truth" of this matter. Way way better than
anything that passes for news on your network television.
I
agree with Chris Bowers. If the Dems were even basic tacticians, then what's the
rush? Do something cosmetic and let the next president handle it.
Sept. 22
Art
for the times.
Sept. 18
What
does fighting crime mean, exactly? Does it mean upholding the law when a woman
shoplifts to feed her children, or does it mean struggling to uncover the ones
who, quite legally, have brought about her poverty?
--from Ozymandias, Watchmen Issue 11
I do believe I have seen the first online
vigilante act that might actually do something. I suppose, when you think about
it, a group of determined super hackers could do just as much damage as the
Justice League.
Anonymous, known for their clever psy ops
war against Scientology, seems to have stepped it up a notch and hacked into
Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account. You can read more at the
Huffington Post,
Gawker and especially check
out the commentary at Boing Boing. Wikileaks has the whole thing but I can't
get the link to work....Some open source spy network if you can't get it to
work during crucial periods...they should use the Pirate Bay's new blogger
system....
Unfortunately, now that you've hacked into
the files of one of the Republican fraternity someone will be working to figure
out who Anonymous actually is. They're going to want to see your face. What's
that last line in the most recent Batman? Why is the Batman running? Because
we're chasing him that's why. I hope they're as good
as the Little Brother
hackers. They'll have to be in order to stay out of jail. Now they've got
Scientology hackers and the US government after them...good luck. Sometimes
justice must be hooded. But not in a Klansman mexican border patrol kind of
way...you know what I mean.
Sept. 17th
Where
would you put a two minute campaign ad? Why, you would put it on the Internet.
That and porn.
Sept. 14th PST
Two
religious toons for Sunday. And here's a daily strip that will never EVER
receive daily syndication. Its
called Cectic. Throw a donation his way or my way (upper left corner. I
could use a new laptop...)
Sept 13
Toon
that City Paper cancelled. Here's an observation: Palin's husband
looks to be a lumberjack
and he's okay. Haven't seen Ted Rall in two weeks at the City Paper. The
cartoonist who replaced Rall isn't as funny. Bastards.
What I Posted on AmSat on 9/11
But Forgot to Post Here
I just think that 9/11 took us down a very dangerous path that we may not
survive. I'm neutral on the Inside Job stuff because I haven't read the
evidence that the 9/11 Truth movement has come up with. But I'm not neutral on
whether the Bush administration was evil enough either to plan it or to let it
happen even if discovered because it just dovetails into their overall plans
too much. They're that evil. And we find out today that Sarah Palin finds all
these wars, all this meaningless horrible killing to be somehow in God's plan.
She thinks a war with Russia might be inevitable. She's going where even
people like Nixon and Kissinger never went. Nuclear exchanges mean billions of
people possibly die. These are very dangerous Republicans. There is no
indication that we dirty fuckin' hippies would beat them in some sort of just
civil war. None at all.
We have to find a way to divert ourselves from this dangerous path where
fighting for oil multinationals is somehow the same as fighting for "de Lawd"...Dangerous
times we live in. Dangerous times.
Gloria
Steinem, on the left, on Sarah Palin, or as she's sometime referred to
around here "Mullah in a Skirt" (I might trademark that....) or as one Salon
reader put it: Auntie Tom.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't
the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she
agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need.
Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making
life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing
pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by
Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton
supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her
down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a
Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as
female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing
and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood
for -- and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin
would be like saying, "Somebody
stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to
be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say
she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if
they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining
her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she
has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe
Biden's 37 years' experience.
....Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear:
She opposes just about
every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She
believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves
global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of
women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only"
programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and
abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot
wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school
system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs
with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in
subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in
the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the
lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
More
from the muckrakers and bottom dwellers who simply can't accept boundaries and
limits from...mainstream
Vanity Fair?
There's
a poll at the end of this by the way and most people think that Trig is
Bristol's kid and that the current pregnancy might be faked to cover it up.
Again, this is real news. Really. No matter what Markos says. Interesting
comment on the photos timeline:
Good start - but you did leave off some of the most
puzzling info! 1. For example, this early February 2008 picture from the
Alaska Daily news (http://www.adn.com/politics/story/339576.html) when she was
in theory five-six months pregnant. 2. The extended podcast of her walking
crisply from her house to her office at six-seven months pregnant. (http://alaskapodshow.com/index.php/2008/08/30/sarah-palin-pregnancy-scandal/)
She doesn't look or act pregnant, and the filming crew didn't see that she was
pregnant. 3. The videotape of her at a Newsweek conference in March 2008
(seven months pregnant), where she similarly does not look like (or stand up
like) she's remotely pregnant (http://www.newsweek.com/id/156190 go to #8,
especially last 30 seconds) 4. The photo of her at the National Governors
Association conference in late February 2008 (don't have the link to the photo
at the moment, but she looks very trim). 5. The uniformly disbelieving
reactions of Alaskans (including her own staff) to her pregnancy announcement
in early March 2008, as reported at the time bby the Alaska Daily News
(http://www.adn.com/front/story/336402.html). 6. This March 14, 2008 photo of
her published in the Alaska Daily News (seven months), again, showing her as
very trim. (http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/345168.html) 7. And, the very
warm family pictures posted by Sadie (boyfriend Levi's sister) on Sadie's
myspace page, where Sadie is cradling baby Trig, and speaking of Trig and
Bristol as members of Sadie's own family. (see http://flickr.com/photos/30128128@N04/sets/72157607061462256/
for a saved set of these photos). If your going to do a great, definitive
timeline like this (thank you!), these items really need to be accounted for
as well!
Have
to admit this a pretty good Al Franken Ad. Don't know why dems don't use more of
that Hollywood mojo...you could easily use it for McCain/Mullah with a Skirt.
Just show two people running...
Sept. 5
Kowardly Kos Strikes Again
I
just happened to have a page of this spiked diary hanging around that Markos
spiked. I placed
it here. Its missing around 500 comments but you can see the essence of the
argument for yourself and determine if censorship should have been used. This
poster placed two diaries on this topic. The first one has gone down the memory
hole and I've restored three fourths of the second post. This was all public
record of course.
I wrote this introduction:
This page was spiked by so-called new
"journalist" Markos Moulitsas. Completely cowardly. Here's a thought:
politicians shouldn't turn their back on promising to filibuster FISA and then
not do it. Markos shouldn't pretend to be a "journalist" and then censor
stories. The worst that can happen here is that this story is proven false.
Then we can move on to the many many other interesting Sarah Palin scandals
whether its trooper gate or book banning gate or sleeping with your husband's
business partner gate, whatever. The best that can happen is that we prove
that she faked her last pregnancy to hide the shame of an illegitimate child
or she was purposely trying to miscarriage by taking that incredibly long and
dangerous plane trip. That's how my grandmother lost one of her kids. Perhaps
that was the point. This goes to the heart of their lying hypocritical family
values bullshit. Look, we bring knives to the knife party. We bring guns to
the gun party. Nothing is off limits. The future of the planet is at stake.
All tools must be used to defeat this Mullah in a Skirt. And if you want to
discuss things
without being censored or disemvoweled, go here. (Unless you spam...)
By
the way, if you're still interested in this discussion,
try "Scienceblogs" (which, unlike Markos, has figured out that all of
these things are worthy of discussion.) Ed Brayton gets this correctly.
Many commenters seem to think that this has something to do with
getting people to vote against McCain. Sorry, not true. This has no
effect at all on my vote no matter what the truth turns out to be, nor
do I think it should have any effect on anyone else's vote. As many have
pointed out, there are far more important and relevant issues if we're
talking about who to vote for. None of that has anything to do with why
I posted on this subject. I just find the notion that someone would try
to pull this off really fascinating and I want to know if, in fact, they
did. I think there's some compelling evidence that has been offered.
There have also been some false claims made about it on both sides
(misdated pictures, for example). I'm quite curious to know what the
truth is and that's why I'm writing about it and inviting new evidence
that might debunk the allegations. I don't have any political stake in
what the truth turns out to be at all, nor do I think anyone else
should. I just think it's a really fascinating story.
Ed understands what online journalism is supposed to be about.
But I do disagree with his determination that this wouldn't be a good reason to
vote against somebody. It obviously would be a good reason to vote against
someone, especially if your base is made up of puritanical, fundamentalist holy
rollers.
Sept 2
You
can see a visibly pissed off Amy Goodman today at
Democracy Now here. For people who don't know this, like, say, my mother:
Amy Goodman is one of the best journalists working in the country today. She
isn't the richest. She's not as entertaining as say a Jon Stewart or Keith
Olbermann. But she's completely independent. And unlike those aforementioned
guys you can't turn her off. Unless you murder her or beat her senseless while
refusing to read the big rectangular press credential tags around her neck. One
of the things that troubles me about her arrest is that she isn't in the best of
health. Its been speculated that the paralysis on one side of her face is stroke
related. This brings us to another uncomfortable question: what happens to
Democracy Now if Amy Goodman can't continue the job?
One thing that I wish Amy would do is take at least six weeks off per year
not to fool around but to lower her stress and to work out. Have people like
Naomi Klein (who would be a perfect replacement for Amy if something bad were to
happen), Mike Moore, Greg Palast, Jane Hamsher or Glenn Greenwald take over for
one or two week runs while she gets better or just, frankly, preserves her
health. They should also be allowed to produce for the week. I'd be curious as
to their takes on the news.
One more thing: Sue! Sue em for a hundred million dollars. Fund Democracy Now
forever.
I
totally missed this. You and I can learn more
about it here. I have no idea if the stories are any good or at the Alan
Moore/Warren Ellis level but I would love to read them.
Jenn
Jannon, who should be named formerly in a suit I'm preparing within the
next several months, can be found on the Internet talking, hilariously enough,
about Working America's "Bad Boss" contest. You would think that someone should
enter Ms. Jannon being that she'll probably be sued for both age and race
discrimination. I tried to make this point at something called the "Gay City
News"
but they haven't seen fit to publish my letter. Luckily, we live here in the
future, so I can publish my own damn letters thank you very much. Here's what I
wrote. Try censoring me. (And yes, I placed both phone calls and emails to two
of the editors, Paul Schindler and Troy Masters, and they didn't return my email
or my phone calls.) I should point out, again, that the positive aspect of this
story is that you should fire people who are being sued for race and age
discrimination. If you were at all "smart" that is...
Well, the worst thing about Jenn
Jannon is that I'm suing her over race and age discrimination. There's also
some evidence that Jenn Jannon could be a great nominee in her
organization's own bad boss contest.
PS: Now, on her old myspace page, which I've managed to save, she does refer
to herself as a
"bisexual" if that makes it all better...Frankly, I think Ms. Jannon is a
terrible person to
promote this particular contest and if the labor movement was smart they
would fire her...I offer that in a positive constructive spirit that aims to
help the labor movement...
Changiness We Can Believe In
Joe
Biden. Meh. Yes, there are a lot of prudent reasons to go with Joe Biden but we
seem to be hearing this a lot whenever the O man moves right, which is all the
time. He is noticing that his poll numbers are plummeting right? He's still
raising lots of money but so what if you lose. Republicans lose all the time
when they have money because people see through them. He does know that he has
to attract white liberals and white liberals tend to read stuff. In fact, they
tend to get their news online. Where else would they go, Fox News? Thomas
Friedman at the Times?
There's also encouraging the crazy people
to put a bullet in you because if you shoot the black guy we get white regular
guy Joe Biden. Thanks for energizing the Krazy Klan with a gun segment of the
population. No thanks. Really. Ignore the history of this country putting
bullets into black leaders. Remember: You're special and nothing bad will happen
to you.
A Special Republican Family
Values Edition of Around the Internets
You
know, when I look at that picture, I don't immediately think of a bible
thumping, anti choice, anti abortion even in the case of rape or incest, anti
birth control kinda of a gal. I think more along the lines of "One hundred
dollars?...Are you crazy? I can go sixty at best...Hey, no need for your big
Mafia Aleut goon pimp to get rough with me I can leave on my own..." (Alleged
nude photo at the Red Light District.)
Second, there's this potentially huge scandal on
whether
or not Sarah Palin is a grandmother and not a mother. The federal scandal
has been kicked around at the Daily Kos for months now but if this scandal is
true, well, her name would have to be withdrawn like Harriet Myers. Now, this
could be a left version of the Obama birth certificate controversy (Of which
there is none. In fact, the only person with a controversy is John McCain who
isn't native born but he's such a horrible candidate who would want to eliminate
him...) but in the world of not teaching your children about sexuality or birth
control it makes perfect sense. And of course you would have to be ashamed about
it. Anyway, here are the juicy parts of the
Daily Kos story. It also has photos and videotape. This is the kind of
journalism that papers used to do and this is also why papers are dying,
deservedly so I might add.
Well, Sarah, I'm calling you a liar. And not even a good
one. Trig Paxson Van Palin is not your son. He is your grandson.
The sooner you come forward with this revelation to the public, the better...
People like to think the vetting process is secure, and completed months
ahead of time, but
ABC News has reported otherwise, painting a picture of a quick vetting
process for Sarah by a small, but secretive group of McCain's legal staff. A
proper vetting process under those circumstances would only go so far, and the
true media vetting process has just begun.It doesn't come as a surprise that
this story was never properly researched. Palin was never on the National
scene for more than a few minutes at a time, and local reporting only goes so
far on a governor with an 80% approval rating. However, the motivation to
cover daughter's pregnancy aligns with her political standings. She valiantly
did not perform an abortion, but fell into the fundamentalist way of thinking,
and covered up for the illicit (but natural) action's of her daughter. There
could be calls below to delete this information. Calls that this type of
information is muckraking and 'below us'. The truth is not below any
progressive, nor any citizen of the world that is one heartbeat away from
having Palin as leader of the free world. We simply ask that she be
forthright, honest, and not waste our time with such juvenile games that
anyone with eyes can see as fabrication.
Bristol Palin rightfully should be able to embrace her child in public
as her own, with no shame, and no quarter. And a mother should be just as
accepting.
I guess we could ask for DNA tests just to clear things up. Here's a
question: who's the real father?
Update: Daily Kos
diary spills water on the rumor. Could you get the doctor to lie as well?
Perhaps this isn't true. Only a woman could look at those photos and determine
if she was five or six months pregnant.
I
totally missed this. You and I can learn more
about it here. I have no idea if the stories are any good or at the Alan
Moore/Warren Ellis level but I would love to read them.
Jenn
Jannon, who should be named formerly in a suit I'm preparing within the
next several months, can be found on the Internet talking, hilariously enough,
about Working America's "Bad Boss" contest. You would think that someone should
enter Ms. Jannon being that she'll probably be sued for both age and race
discrimination. I tried to make this point at something called the "Gay City
News"
but they haven't seen fit to publish my letter. Luckily, we live here in the
future, so I can publish my own damn letters thank you very much. Here's what I
wrote. Try censoring me. (And yes, I placed both phone calls and emails to two
of the editors, Paul Schindler and Troy Masters, and they didn't return my email
or my phone calls.) I should point out, again, that the positive aspect of this
story is that you should fire people who are being sued for race and age
discrimination. If you were at all "smart" that is...
Well, the worst thing about Jenn
Jannon is that I'm suing her over race and age discrimination. There's also
some evidence that Jenn Jannon could be a great nominee in her
organization's own bad boss contest.
PS: Now, on her old myspace page, which I've managed to save, she does refer
to herself as a
"bisexual" if that makes it all better...Frankly, I think Ms. Jannon is a
terrible person to
promote this particular contest and if the labor movement was smart they
would fire her...I offer that in a positive constructive spirit that aims to
help the labor movement...
Changiness We Can Believe In
Joe
Biden. Meh. Yes, there are a lot of prudent reasons to go with Joe Biden but we
seem to be hearing this a lot whenever the O man moves right, which is all the
time. He is noticing that his poll numbers are plummeting right? He's still
raising lots of money but so what if you lose. Republicans lose all the time
when they have money because people see through them. He does know that he has
to attract white liberals and white liberals tend to read stuff. In fact, they
tend to get their news online. Where else would they go, Fox News? Thomas
Friedman at the Times?
There's also encouraging the crazy people
to put a bullet in you because if you shoot the black guy we get white regular
guy Joe Biden. Thanks for energizing the Krazy Klan with a gun segment of the
population. No thanks. Really. Ignore the history of this country putting
bullets into black leaders. Remember: You're special and nothing bad will happen
to you.
Because
we need a nicer family friendly Sin City. Related: Warner Brothers
released an animated version of the first issue of Watchmen online for free. I
really liked it although they should have hired a woman to voice Sally Jupiter.
And of course the writing is brilliant. Alan Moore is one of the greatest
writers alive, period. Maybe ever. Please do this with Promethea, Top Ten, Tom
Strong and the League.
Watch here.
Well,
I heard a rumor that
Caroline Kennedy would get the vicepresidential nod from Obama.
I think she would be a great choice. The only problem is
that the
rumor came from The Evil One, officially a member of The League of Evil
Bloggers and who should join the Evil League of Evil because, let's face it, the
Instapundit is qualified. I'm just saying that if Glenn is spreading the rumor
then that means incriminating photos are on hand about Caroline.
But a Kennedy would be an inspired choice.
She's actually more liberal than either Obama or Hillary. You know, the problem
with Obama isn't with the black base, its with white liberals who are pissed off
about FISA and the immediate backtracking on offshore drilling. You add a
conservative vice presidential pick and that's a third strike recipe for
trouble. Just for the record, I'm pissed off about those things too. Its about
his word. What good is it if the face of oppression is black?
Evan Bayh (early supporter of the Iraq
War), Joe Biden (hustler for the credit card industry) and Sam Nunn (Look, why
not go with Tom Ridge...he's more liberal.) would all be depressing. I can't
even say a Hillary nod out loud. Why not just appoint a knife at your back?
Would be simpler. A Kennedy, or someone to his left, would be really nice and, I
think, make him a lot safer. Richardson would be a good choice as well. If you
look at the history of recent presidential assassinations (and these wonderfully
timed plane crashes that only kill Democratic Party Senators and one liberal
republican senator from Pennsylvania..) then you don't want a Lyndon Johnson or
Sam Nunn as your backup. You want Dan Quayle. Everybody knew the first George
Bush was safe because we were all scared of Dan. You know what's interesting
about that? The older and better George Bush used to run the CIA and he might
have known what happened in the Kennedy assassination. He didn't pick Lyndon
Johnson or anybody competent that would inspire a "replacement" scenario. You
don't want anyone to say "You know, if something Bad were to happen to
Obama I bet Nunn or Hillary would get that draft started that we want so
much..." Downgrades the predictable racists with guns scenario if a woman or a
latino are next in line...takes away all the fun. Of course, someone who's a
black man and thinks he can win the presidency of this country is probably an
optimist at heart. He would have to be. "Oh, they won't shoot me and I won't
have problems with my plane. I'm special."
Al Gore would be good too. This means that
we're probably getting Evan or Sam. Ack.
Another
thing wrong with the Obama campaign is that his ads have no kick. Let me guess:
the candidate that will be backed by the Hollywood Left won't use any of their
expertise during the election. Just great. I do like his middle class first
theme.
This
is also what Mike Doyle has signed on to. I don't think Mike is bloodthirsty but
it does show the power of AIPAC, yet again. It's probably what Jason Altmire
supports too although I haven't looked yet. Do I have to? This would be an act
of war. The Iranians might be able to defend themselves. You wouldn't like
living in Richard Matheson's "I Am Legend" world you really wouldn't.
August 14
Okay. We got letters from
Titus North. Here's his first one:
Hi Philip,
I had a look at your
website today and I liked what I saw. Regarding my choice of races to run,
I did run for mayor in 2005. In 2007 I almost persuaded a prominent
Pittsburgher who would have stood a good chance of winning to throw his or
her hat into the ring, but in the end the problem was that in non-federal
races candidates can raise unlimited funds from corporate sources without
even cute accounting. We in the
Allegheny County Green Party
tried hard to get substantive candidates to run against
Jason Altmire and
Tim Murphy, but
running is very hard work and involves a great deal of sacrifice. (Perhaps
someone with as much on his mind as you might want to consider it?) As for
Mike Doyle, part of
the reason for running against him is that he is not hopeless like Altmire,
but rather can be pressured to modify his stands when the voters send him
a message. For instance, you brought up his vote against funding the war
in Iraq, but before I ran against him he consistently voted for funding
and supported the occupation. I am not saying I made him change all by
himself, but its hard to believe he failed to take notice when almost
18,000 people in his district voted for an unfunded third-party adjunct
professor. All I am trying to do is make sure he has to work for people's
votes. If I get elected, fine, but otherwise I think I am succeeding in
making Doyle better. Keep up the good work.
Titus North
I then responded and said that he had some
valid points. I also noted that we had met before when I wrote about 2004 Green
Presidential David Cobb visiting the Pittsburgh area. I was the only one who
covered him because the corporate media would never do anything to give free
promotion to a third party, especially a progressive third party. I also wrote
this (I'm not including everything I said because I wrote some things that could
help the Green Party or any aspiring third party...why make that public?):
Someone in the green party
should take a look at what Sean Tevis is doing as well.
By the way, we have met. I was the black guy who came over to your house and
asked David Cobb some
tough questions. African Americans would love a choice other than
republicans. Why you're not
running black candidates in the cities bewilders me. I think I asked
somebody to get back to me on
that nobody did. I'm still interested. I hope someone gets back to me this
time.
Philip Shropshire
www.threeriversonline.com
PS: Did you guys make the presidential ballot this year? How about Nader?
So Titus responded with this:
I
remember you well, Philip, but I did not connect your name with your face.
As you probably know, we nominated
Cynthia McKinney
and Rosa Clemente for Pres and VP. I hope that having an all-black ticket
will attract more black voters, leaders, and candidates to our party,
because a party made of up only of granola-crunching, tree-hugging old
hippies like me isn't going anywhere. As for the ballot, we did not make
the ballot in Pennsylvania,
although I will be on the ballot in the 14th district and we have two
candidates in Pittsburgh
for state legislature. Our ticket will be on the ballot in most states,
however, and Nader made the ballot in PA, barring some thoroughly corrupt
challenge. While we have virtually no money, when you feel justice is on
your side sometimes you just have to struggle against the odds. Feel free
to post my earlier letter on your blog if you wish. Thanks for the prompt
response.
Titus
Now, I have to admit after reading this I
was all set for a rigorous rebuttal until he sent this in on August 7:
Hi Philip,
I am just sending you this for your information. This is part of the reason
that Doyle needs constant pressure.
Titus
Friends:
I know some of you are not in Doyle�s district but it wouldn�t hurt to call
him anyway. I am trying to get a meeting at his Pittsburgh office with one
of his aides, and if I do I will need people to join me in expressing our
concern over his supporting this legislation.
Meanwhile please contact his office
412
261 5091.
Scilla Wahrhaftig
AFSC Pennsylvania Program Director
7514 Kensington Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15221
(412)
371 3607
www.afsc.org/pittsburgh
URGE DOYLE TO WITHDRAW SUPPORT FOR IRAN BLOCKADE!
Rep. Doyle has (surprisingly) cosponsored a dangerous piece of legislation
calling on the president to implement a blockade and diplomatic quarantine
on Iran . More than half of Congress has cosponsored this bill, although we�ve
heard reports from staffers and members that they did not understand the
gravity of the bill they were signing onto. They thought that it was simply
another nonbinding bill advocating sanctions against Iran�they didn�t know
that the bill could easily be construed as a request from Congress to
implement a land, air, and sea blockade and a ban on the international
travel of all Iranian officials, including diplomats (until Iran suspends
uranium enrichment). They didn�t understand that the bill asks the president
to do something which, to be effective, would require the use of force, make
diplomacy impossible, and be construed by Iran and the international
community at large as an act of war.
So we�re hoping you will tell him! TAKE ACTION and tell Rep. Doyle you
oppose the bill by sending a quick email now.
4 members have withdrawn their cosponsorship [Representatives Tim Cohen
(TN), Tom Allen (ME) and Wm. Lacy Clay (MO) and Danny Davis (IL)]. We hope
that others can be persuaded to withdraw over the August recess because this
is the surest way to stop this dangerous resolution in its tracks when
Congress returns in September.
Attached are FCNL�s talking points, FCNL�s letter against the bill, and most
importantly, a sample dialogue between a concerned constituent on the bill
and their member/staffer. (It may also be important to mention that there is
significant Jewish-American opposition to H.Con.Res. 362. See the Americans
for Peace Now website and the J Street Lobby website.)
The reason to ask members to withdraw is simple. The resolution can easily
be read as calling for a blockade of Iran , which would be an act of war, as
well as a humiliating diplomatic quarantine of Iran that would make
negotiations practically impossible. The administration will read support
for H.Con.Res. 362 as congressional support for a belligerent approach to
Iran . Some within the administration continue to argue for military action
before President Bush leaves office. Support for H.Con.Res. 362 will
encourage them, perhaps fatally.
If he cannot be persuaded to withdraw there are other, less helpful but
still positive, actions that you could encourage her to take. For example,
Barney Frank (MA) has publically expressed regret that he agreed to
cosponsor the resolution without first reading it carefully and has said he
will work to remove the blockade language. And Robert Wexler (FL) has
pledged to work to remove the blockade language and add a call for the U.S.
to talk directly to Iran . If he cannot be persuaded to withdraw, s/he could
be asked to issue a public statement clarifying her views and to work to
change the resolution or prevent it from coming up for a vote.
Thanks for anything you can do on this. Stopping H.Con.Res. 362 could help
avert another catastrophic war in the Middle East and achieve a negotiated
solution to the dispute over Iran �s nuclear program and other issues of
concern.
Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns�and let me know how
your visit went!
All the best, Kate
PS This is the most inflammatory language of the bill, clause 3: (3) demands
that the President initiate an international effort to immediately and
dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on
Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia,
prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing
stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes,
trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the
international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating
the suspension of Iran's nuclear program..
So, I have to run out and run errands. With
Friday's edition I will attempt to answer these arguments. Needless to say the
blockade of Iran would be an act of war. And, afterall, you want a war with Iran
because the Iraq war has gone so well. We've only murdered up to a 1.4 million
Iraqis in that war so what's the harm. Just brown skinned sand niggers afterall.
Their lives mean nothing compared to the profits of the oil oligarchs. Long live
the Klingon Sith American Empire (cue ominous Stars Wars
music....)...Rebuttal tonight. But, let's face it, bad move by Mike Doyle.
Horrific actually.
August 13
You
can catch a free showing of Dr. Horrible. It was obviously posted by a man who
aspires to join the Evil League of Evil. Related:Current
(possibly) members of the Evil League of Evil. Not to be confused with the
League of Evil Bloggers on this site's bottom left column.
I'm
enjoying my weekend doing nothing. Still working on Titus and review pieces for
Monday when people actually read this thing. You can always watch my channel if
I don't write anything. That's why its there.
If you're interested in watching yet
another movie about the election integrity movement, then please go here:
I
will leave you with
this scary thing from Undernews about how the Iranians might fight back
effectively. I know its irritating when those brown skinned people you're trying
to murder so you can steal their stuff fight back but this is the predictable
problem of the bully. We've seen this movie before and the United States has
officially become "Biff".
The two-ton elephant in the living room of
the neo-con strategy is the advanced biowar that Iran, and to a lessor extent
Syria, has. This places the motherlands of the major neo-con nations (America,
France, the United Kingdom), as well as Israel, in grave danger. When the
Soviet Union fell the Iranians hired as many out-of-work former Soviet
advanced biowar experts as possible. In the last 15 or so years they have
helped to develop a truly world class ABW program utilizing recombination DNA
genetic engineering technology to create a large number of man made killer
viruses. This form of weapon system does not require high tech military
delivery systems. The viruses are sub-microscopic and once seeded in a
population use the population itself as vectors. Seeding can be done without
notice in shopping malls, churches, and other public places. The only real
defense to an advanced global strategic biowar attack is to lock down the
population as rapidly as possible and let those infected die off.
Unless the public gets it act together and forces the neo-cons to stop the
march to yet another war in the Middle East we are apt to see a truly horrific
nightmare unfold in our countries.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
August 5
Above:
I hear Zack filmed three hours worth of the Watchmen. My only concern is the no
name actors involved. I think that was the thing that really hurt the League of
Extraordinary Gentlemen, that and the fact that they mangled the plot into
something unrecognizable and silly, giving away one of the final scenes in
Watchmen to boot. Ditto for Wanted, which wasn't bad but it would have been
better if they had just done it like the Wanted comic books. I hear hero movies
are making money these days. Is Sin City the only franchise that will ever
understand this? Below: The animated Get Your War On. Editorial note:
Green Party candidate Titus North has responded to my remarks below. I'll get up
his responses as quickly as possible. I think he makes some good points, as well
as some very very bad points such as "Look, we nominated two black people that
have no chance of winning. Woohoo!"
August 2
Impressive
journalism (real) from Glenn Greenwald about the anthrax case. He's asking
the right sort of questions. Brief contextual update on this issue: when the
anthrax first hit it was sold as yet another attack by that swarthy Iraqi
Saddam, who only hated democratic senators apparently. Now, in retrospect, it
looks like an inside job that encouraged us to murder lots and lots of innocent
brown people and steal their oil. I left this message and some interview
prospects for his new radio show:
I don't know. He seems more like a fall
guy than anything else. I'm going to put on my
JFK Mr. X
fedora and state that this feels like a false flag operation
designed to drive the war into Iraq and targeted, coincidently
enough, at people in congress and the press who might have been able
to stop the war earlier.
Now what? I guess we'll never get to the
bottom of this. How sad. Well played shadowy dark forces who seem to
be running things. Of course, we should hope that Obama isn't
"partisan" and doesn't demand anything "strident" like making sure a
war criminal like George Bush faces impeachment charges and a one
way ticket to the Hague.
Philip Shropshire
http://www.threeriversonline.com
PS: By the way, in case you missed my
comments yesterday (letter 372 I think), please consider grilling
and interviewing election fraud experts Bob Fitrakis, Greg Palast
and Mark Crispin Miller for your new podcast. This is yet another
glaring blind spot from both atriots and kossacks in that even after
witnessing two national presidential elections stolen they don't
want to do anything or demand anything to prevent it from happening
again.
PPS: Agree with you about the Blue dogs
but go one step further. Consider third party and independent
candidates in house and senate races where the choice is between the
DLC and the GOP. But be realistic. You need 1 million to fund a
viable house campaign and 2 million to fund a viable senate
campaign. Take a hard look at Cindy Sheehan's campaign against
Pelosi and try to put at least 50 grand into that race by hook or by
crook. I might know a way if anyone's curious...
July 30 PST
I
get press releases from Environmental Organizations:
Sierra Club to Air TV Ad, Hold Local Event Contrasting McCain & Obama
Plans to Deal with
Gas Prices
as Oil Industry Rakes in
Record Profits
Pittsburgh, PA –
Pittsburgh residents will gather on Thursday to highlight Big Oil’s newly
announced billions in record quarterly profits. The largest oil companies
together are expected to post more than $35 billion in profits for the
second quarter alone—putting them on pace to exceed last year’s record
profits of more than $123 billion. The event will also contrast the major
differences between who would benefit under each of the candidates’ plans
to deal with our energy crisis.
The Sierra Club will
unveil a new television ad on Thursday that contrasts McCain’s plan for a
$3.8 billion tax cut for Big Oil (in addition to billions in
existing government giveaways) with
Barack Obama’s plan for an immediate $1,000 tax cut to
provide American consumers with real relief, while putting us on the path
to energy independence through a $150 billion investment in clean,
renewable energy.
In addition to the
local event, national Sierra Club leaders and other progressive groups
will discuss new television ads and other activities on a national press
teleconference to take place Thursday.
Gas Station Event
WHAT:
Pittsburgh residents at an area Exxon station to highlight Big Oil’s new
quarterly profit totals. Ordinary citizens filling up their tanks will be
informed of the energy plans of both Senator McCain and Senator Obama
WHO: Sierra
Club, Sierra Club members, League of Young Voters, American Progress
WHERE: Exxon
Station –
3500 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213
WHEN: 1:00 pm
to 2:00 pm – Thursday, July 31st
VISUALS:
Assorted Global Warming Props and Signs
July 28 PST
Left
this
over at Ralph Nader's new website. I don't support his presidential bid but
I offered up my 5/25 plan yet again. Short review: Third parties
shouldn't contest every damn seat but focus on 25 house seats and five senate
seats and fully fund them at 1 million per house seat and 2 million per senate
seat. That's not a minor amount but given what we've seen Ron Paul and Barack
Obama do I really think that's possible. If the Netroots really wants to put the
fear of god into the Democrats stop giving them money even when they screw you.
Even though Regina Thomas lost, run somebody in the general as a death sentence.
Pick five pro Fisa, pro Iraq dems and tell them to "Suck on This" as it were.
Recruit Hollywood hard. Real hard. Run canvass based, internet based campaigns
as cheaply as possible. Stir and then bake.
Here's what I wrote over there:
I'm with Joe on this one.
Run for Joe Biden's senate seat. Actually, as a senator, you can do
something pretty powerful. You can use the filibuster. In fact, I have
something called the 5/25 plan which I wish independent parties would use.
You don't need to contest all the seats. You just need 25 house seats and
five senate seats and use those numbers as voting blocs. Here's the
important thing abut those 5 senate seats, you would need those senators to
use the old fashioned filibuster as a group. You would'nt necessarily have
to win but with five senators working together you could change things. You
could at least use it to counter the GOP filibuster. Who knows. Perhaps they
would get rid of the filibuster which would be fine in that its used to
defeat mostly progressive measures all the time. I really wish Ralph would
go after Joe Biden's seat or, all those seats where you have DLC dems
running against the GOP (nothing changes)...You do need to raise at least 1
million to contest a house seat and 2 million dollars to contest a senate
seat using a paid field canvass (which I could run if anyone is asking) and
internet media until the last few weeks of the election.
I think Ralph could win a decently funded campaign running against the two
party system. I really think he could beat Joe Biden. I don't think he has a
realistic chance at the presidency.
Philip Shropshire
www.threeriversonline.com
PS: I did some paid sig work for Ralph in Pennsylvania. Wasn't easy. I'm
also a lifelong fan of Ralph and think he's the greatest journalist who ever
lived.
Speaking
of bad third party runs, looks like strictly symbolic Green Party candidate
Titus North is about to make a go of it again.
Of course, there are some local
races that just scream out for a third party run. How about a race against our
GOP-lite icon of machine corruption/incompetence and future DLCer Pittsburgh
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl?
Nope. Gonna pass huh.
Well, how about Pro Fisa, Pro Iraq
war insurance lobbyist jock Jason Altmire, who is one of the few Northern
candidates to be targeted by Open Left as a
Bush Dog Democrat?
Nyet again you say.
Certainly, it couldn't be US
Congressman Mike Doyle, the guy who voted to slash Iraq War funding and just
brought the entire FCC to town to fight for Net Neutrality, not him right?
Wrong.
Titus North is running against
Mike Doyle. I guess, for a green, when you vote badly on coal issues it doesn't
matter if you voted the right way in order to stop killing Iraqis. Thanks Titus.
I'm glad that people who think that environmentalists don't have their
priorities straight can't gloat too much about your decision to run. See clip
below. I am impressed with his Japanese though.
July 25
Still
working on reviews of the Batman movie and the last issue of Black Summer,
where, as I suspected, Tom Noir faked his own death. Of course, that means the
ending will leave us a bit tantalized. I also disagree with Tom's indictment of
John but more on that later. There is ample evidence that the law wouldn't have
done the right thing and
impeached President George Bush, or that fictional guy that got killed in
the Black Summer books.
I
get letters. Or I get comments. Earlier I wrote something about the White Rose
Society, or the peace group that opposed the Nazis and that ended up with a lot
of them being executed because that's what the Nazis do. They're Nazis. Someone
from the White Rose Society responded to this:
The American Peace Movement failed. It failed
to stop the war and the subsequent deaths of a million innocent Iraqis. It
probably won't stop a war with Iran where the death tolls--after speculated
attacks on nuclear power plant facilities--would probably start at one
million.
The White Rose Society,
full of decent courageous people, didn't beat the Nazis, either
Then a representative from the White Rose
Society
wrote this:
You mentioned White Rose
resistance in Hitler's Germany as though what they did was all for nothing.
That's actually not the case.
After the war, Fritz Hartnagel (Sophie Scholl's sometimes boyfriend) became
a judge because of her courage and death. He dedicated his life to
protecting the rights of conscientious objectors in postwar Germany, and in
protesting nuclear proliferation on German soil.
Traute Lafrenz, one of the White Rose dissidents who survived, came to the
United States. She was director of a school near Chicago for mentally
handicapped children - poetic justice, since those same children would have
been euthanized in her homeland betweeb 1933 and 1945.
Eugen Grimminger, who financed White Rose activities, became an outspoken
economist and occasional politician in southern Germany, trying to ensure
that those who had been Nazis were prevented from returning to power.
Alex Schmorell's brother Erich established a peace and reconciliation
foundation for German-Russian relations.
Christoph Probst's widow and children have fought for justice and peace on
many levels in Germany and around the world.
None of this postwar effort would have occurred had not the 30 - 50
"members" of the White Rose been willing to sacrifice everything. Friends,
family, and survivors were motivated by the memories of those who were
beheaded.
Sometimes we don't get to see the results of our our good works. Doesn't
mean we shouldn't do them anyway.
First, thank you for
responding. For some reason my email notification doesn't work that well. So
I just noticed this.
Two, I think I was making the argument that they weren't effective in
stopping the nazis, well intentioned and noble that they were. I would have
to state that the russian and american armies were more effective than the
white rose society in stopping the nazis. I also think that the american
peace movement has failed. Draw your own conclusions as to what our next
moves should be. I guess we're all hoping that Obama will become president
and he'll do the decent thing and withdraw troops and imperial hostilities
but the war has become quite profitable and with his FISA turnaround
everything he says
July 22
I'm
not sure, but I think by federal law and or decree and or executive order I have
to go see the new Batman movie tomorrow. Well, all right. As I have often
stated, I have the same respect for the law as the current president of the
United States therefore...
A Before I Enjoy Heath Ledger's Psychotic Onslaught Around
the Internets
Lots
of interesting news on the election fraud front. This is my Pittsburgh beat
because nobody at the respectable corporate media outlets thinks you being
robbed of the franchise merits even a graph or two. Some highlights: Bradblog
reports on the reopening of
the 2004 Ohio Election Fraud case. It mentions Karl Rove by name and a
hacker who explains the truth of our election systems:
Spoonamore on vote counting: "What happens at the
end of the day, all those votes are thrown into a magic box with one troll
inside, the troll jumps out and says 'Here are your results! Ta-Da!!' That's
it. There's no validation of the code, there's no authentication.
"With the Connelly Anomaly, if that was in a
banking environment, instantaneously --- instantaneously! --- the entire
system inside that box would be frozen. Any programmer who reviewed any of
that code would be alerted, all the executives assisting in that process
would be alerted, the hard drives would be frozen in place, extracted and
immediately placed in forensic analysis. 'Cause somebody did something
major."
Spoonamore again: "None of us [the American
people] really want to confront the fact that there appears to be an
extremely coordinated effort by a very small group of people to rig
elections and take control of the executive branch."
"You can spend all day every day looking at this
stuff and saying, 'Well that would certainly launch a fraud investigation in
a bank, but it doesn't when it comes to our vote.' Why?"
When asked by a reporter to respond to the fact that both Democratic
and Republican Secretaries of State and elected officials will say that our
elections are run on a bi-partisan system, Spoonamore responded, "No it's
not. It's not a bi-partisan system. This entire system is being programmed
in secret by programmers who have no oversight by anybody. In my opinion,
both sides [Democrats and Republicans] have no friggin' clue what they're
talking about."
"The person who programs the code inside the
machine will decide the results."
Spoonamore was asked, "Are you a Republican?" And
his priceless response was "Yes, I've been a life-long member of the
Republican party. Sadly." That prompted a burst of laughter from all
assembled.
Related: Allegation of Arizona election fraud. More
Related: Go watch the Mark Crispen talk with the real journalists behind
"Loser Take All". Try
here,
here
and
here.
Now, look, and I don't want to sound un-American, but if
that's his definition, and I'm actually pretty sure that it is, then I prefer
that we lose in Iraq. Big time. Go ahead. Claim I'm an enemy combatant and lock
me up
without trial indefinitely. Ha ha ha. Never in America right...
Speaking
of fascism, Chris Floyd
puts
together the dots globally (with a focus on the neofascists in Italy) and
tells us that there are no center left parties in most of the industrialized
nations of the world. They've all been co-opted. When things like that happen
across the globe perhaps its inappropriate to call them "accidents".
II. But Milne makes a further point. The
rise of neo-fascism in Italy, and elsewhere, is tied to the collapse -- or
rather the surrender -- of center-left parties to the pernicious doctrines
of the Right. Everywhere, these parties --- Democrats in America, Labour in
the UK, various Social Democrats throughout Europe – have turned themselves
into pale copies of conservative parties, adopting policies that have
degraded society, destroyed communities, entrenched injustice, rewarded
greed, poisoned the earth, embraced militarism and aggression, inflicted
vast suffering on developing nations (through the straightjacket of "market
reforms," i.e., corporate-crony welfare), subverted democracy, diminished
liberty and gutted the very notion of the common good.
[Yet we are being too kind in calling
this process a "surrender." As
Arthur Silber has pointed out many times, the Democrats – and New Labour
and other craven centre-left parties – have embraced the Right's agenda of
elitist domination, militarism and scorn for the common good because they
agree with it. Any figures with genuinely "progressive" views have been
winnowed out or marginalized by the big money machines that run the parties.
Such people are always a minority amongst the self-interested factions who
vie for domination over a nation's affairs, of course. But there used to be
a more substantial minority of such folks in U.S. politics, with enough
leverage to sometimes affect national policy and even score some successes.
But this strain has been almost completely bred out, as we have seen in the
latest Democratic Congress – the most reviled and unpopular Congress in
American history.]
And there's this:
In the
current U.S. presidential campaign, we can see this dynamic of center-left
collaboration with the Right – which has been going on for almost a
quarter-century in America – playing itself out once again. Barack Obama's
"surge" to the Right – as exemplified by his vote for
the tyrannical FISA measure – is just another iteration of this process.
Likewise, his embrace of the Terror War; true, he wants to do it more
"efficiently," and perhaps add a few more targets – in Pakistan, say – but
he still wants to do it. He makes
no bones about continuing this militarist project which has already killed
hundreds of thousands of innocent people, bankrupted the national treasury,
and is now – through the Terror War oil price spike – strangling the entire
national economy. All of this – especially the Terror War's continuing
brutalization and coarsening of the national ethos – is meet food for
neo-fascism to feed upon.
And it's already gorging itself in its ancestral homeland. Rounding up Gypsy
children, fingerprinting them, driving them from their homes, applauding
pogroms -- as Faulkner said, the past is never dead; it's not even past.
July 11 (major reverse pych
fail!)
Above: How
I feel about the blue dogs. (Eww. Can they make his teeth any
yellower?)Also: Don't give to Barry.
Give
to the ACLU. Don't reward Barry for
doing evil and bowing down. Below: How I feel about the war and the
mentality of the people who started it. Note to moving to the center City Paper:
Derf and Red Meat aren't as funny as
Tom the Dancing Bug.
When Ruben is on he's The Funny.
July 6 (*My reverse psychology
worked! I probably won't post anything until Friday night....)
First,
from Undernews (And above Sam's vid about his failed generation. Priceless yet
sad.):
from an ad in the NY Times
INDEPENDENCE
DAY July 4, 1776 - 2008
When in
the course of human events the government becomes destructive of the ends
for which it was established, it is the Right of the People to alter it and
demand restoration of those Constitutional Principles that have so long
assured their Liberty, Safety, and Happiness. Therefore, on the anniversary
of our
Independence, we offer this new
declaration for our times.
The history of this
president is one of arbitrary usurpations of power,
the effect of which is to establish tyranny through false promises of
gerater security.
He has
created a multitude of secret programs and sent swarms of petty officers to
spy on Americans
in a misguided effort to combat foreign terrorism. He has invested these
agents with sweeping new powers to monitor our conversations and ransack our
personal papers and effects without judicial supervision or any reason to
believe -- as the Constitution requires -- that a crime has been committed.
He has
further claimed the power to disregard legislation
that Congress has passed.
He has
suspended the laws and treaties against torture,
authorized the kidnapping of mere suspects, and transported hundreds of
prisoners beyond seas so that no independent judiciary could question the
legality of their mistreatment.
He and
his supporters in Congress have granted amnesty
to the officials who unleashed torture and humiliation upon helpless
prisoners, to the disgrace of our nation.
He has
denied these prisoners access to attorneys, family, and friends
and has claimed the right to try them before military tribunals specifically
designed to disregard the most basic principles of law.
He has
imprisoned thousands of lawful immigrants for months without
charges, under brutal conditions, until his agents, rather than independent
courts, decide that they posed no threat.
He has
wrapped his usurpations of power and his deprivations of liberty in thick
cloaks of secrecy,
thereby showing contempt for the rule of law and the proper functions of
Congress, the courts, and the press.
At
every stage of these oppressions we have sought redress,
but our petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.
We,
therefore, resolve to resist these usurpations by all lawful means at our
disposal.
We insist that the powers of our national government be shared by all
branches of that government and not concentrated in one alone. And we call
upon Congress, the courts, and the press to reassert their constitutional
functions and restore the promise that is
America.
To
these ends, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor
There are many things I would list as things which
make me proud of my country. I'm proud, for example that the first
non-white candidate for the Presidency will be nominated to head the
ticket of one of our two major parties. I'm proud that we have the freedom
of speech to say what we want, including expressing our opinions on our
blogs. However,
one of the things of which our Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice claims
she is most proud, would not be on my list.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said
she's "proud'' of the U.S. decision to wage the Iraq war and insisted
that the world is not more dangerous than it was when George W. Bush
took office.
"We're now beginning to see that perhaps it's
not so popular to be a suicide bomber. We're beginning to see that
perhaps people are questioning whether Osama Bin Laden ought to really
be the face of Islam,'' Rice, 53, said in an interview to be broadcast
this weekend on Bloomberg Television's "Conversations with Judy
Woodruff."
"And I am proud of the decision of this
administration to overthrow Saddam Hussein," said Rice, who was Bush's
national security adviser at the time of the March 2003 invasion. As of
yesterday, 4,107 U.S. soldiers died in Iraq and more than 30,000 were
wounded. She said the Iraq war has been "tougher than any of us really
dreamed."
Well, I guess some people have no shame. They
don't mind being proud that they lied us into an unnecessary war of
aggression in violation of the UN Charter against a foe who was no threat
to our security. An illegal war which led to the deaths of hundreds of
thousands, if not millions of people, and made millions more refugees. A
war in which we have tortured and abused prisoners, burned to death
innocent women and children with napalm and white phosphorus weapons,
poisoned others with depleted uranium, destroyed the infrastructure of an
entire country leaving lakes of sewage visible from space, and committed
war crimes on a regular basis. Not what I'd be proud about. But then I'm
not a lying sycophant who licks George Bush's boots, and considers him my
surrogate husband, either.
One day, if there is any justice in the world
Madam Secretary, you will be tried for your crimes against humanity. If
not, I can only hope that, if there is a God, he, she or it will provide
you with a suitable and eternal punishment for your many terrible sins.
Oh, and Happy Independence Day to you, too
Holiday Weekend Around The Internets
(Nothing Until Sunday Night or Later)
Tom
the Dancing Bug, now seen mostly here since the City Paper has betrayed all that
is good and funny in this evil evil world, can be seen above. Appropriate for
the holiday. Below: New band I like called "She Wants Revenge". I think the lead
singer is black or of mixed race. The band sounds a lot like Interpol. I thought
it was Interpol. You just don't see or hear that everyday.
His work on FISA has been outstanding as well. Here he takes
on the thing that can't be named in most corporate media outlets.
Anti-semitism" accusations have been cynically
exploited for so long by right-wing advocates as a bludgeon to silence debates
over Middle East policy and for cheap political gain that the accusation has
become trivialized to the point of irrelevance. Most ironically of all, the
ADL -- whose ostensible central mission is to battle the trivialization of
anti-Semitism and Nazism -- has played a leading role in this degradation,
constantly exploiting its once-credible imprimatur in
highly politicized ways which have nothing to do with real anti-semitism
(such as Klein's perfectly legitimate commentary) and everything to do with
promoting a hard-line policy in the Middle East and against Iran which is now
one of
the ADL's top priorities.
Smearing people as anti-Semites for cheap political
gain is repellent in its own right and merits a response. But this tactic is
particularly dangerous now, as the pressure is obviously being
ratcheted up in
numerous circles to pursue a far more bellicose policy towards Iran.
Responding to the types of disgusting smears that are in Rubin's column and
many other places, Obama not only
appeared before AIPAC last month and vowed that "the danger from Iran is
grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat"; that Iran's
"Quds force has rightly been labeled a terrorist organization"; and "I will do
everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon," but
also, when asked last week by a
Fox News host to play a "word association game" whereby he should say the
first word that comes into his mind, Obama -- when the word was "Iran" --
responded as follows: "threat."
Whether Iran is really a threat to the U.S. (as
opposed to Israel) is an absolutely critical matter to examine. It's just not
tolerable to allow polemicists from Commentary and Weekly Standard
to run around using the "dual loyalty" argument and "anti-semitism" smear to
try to manipulate American Jews into voting for McCain and supporting
hard-line policies toward Iran, while simultaneously screaming "anti-Semite"
at those who argue that an attack on Iran would serve (and is motivated by)
Israeli interests, not America's interests. That is a perfectly legitimate
issue -- a central issue -- to be freely discussed.
I
still agree with this. I will vote tactically until a viable third party
comes along, if ever. But I won't be a stenographer for the king. I will
criticize bad policy no matter who supports it.
One more thing: all that consultation with Jeff
and Chris doesn't mean smack without the filibuster. The republicans, evil
as they are, will fight tooth and nail for business interests. They use the
filibuster so much I've lost count. And they do it because they represent
evil and they believe in evil. The least good for the least in number is
their mantra. Meanwhile, the dems reflect the old Richard Hofstadter
argument in that the GOP appears more authentic because they really openly
represent evil, where dems cave and mess around and flippity flop and in
true Clintonian style usually end up supporting evil too. The Dems have
become a business party that only pretends to give a fuck about the "common"
people. It's also why the public sees them as vacillating and weak.
Deservedly so I might add.
Here's a great opportunity for the dems to show
their spine on one issue. Hard to see other issues they're showing spine on.
And you think when we have 61 or 95 dems (in the senate) that would change
with the current leadership? 39 Republicans and handful of dems will
continue to do the devils work. It will be the mich sens and Mary when real
alt fuel and cafe standards are proposed. Insurance companies will put the
lock on Chris when the overall Obama plan fails and the plan b Medicaid for
everyone option is floated. They'll get our guy bob casey and those awful
southern dem senators on the social issues stuff...
One final thing: a very wise man, Nathan Newman,
said that the dems should have used the fillibuster when they were in the
minority and gladly let the republican majority strip it from them. Now that
looks pretty good. But what happened is that DLC/AIPAC duopoly essentially
preserved the right of the fillibuster for the republicans to use in case
some wacko decided to try and pass a bill that would help the public...I'm
not mad at anybody and I intend to vote for Barry but this is the reality.
No substantive change in our lives will come from this government. There's
other things that can be done though...one or two of them anyway. Hope space
exploration makes a singularity like leap and I'm off to Mars. I hear the
soil is good for asparagus..
Actually, after reading that, I am mad at somebody.
Did
you know that the war with Iran has been war gamed? Have you wondered what the
future results would be? Well, they're not pretty. In fact, the results read
like a bad science fiction scenario that you wouldn't like to live in. Except
you would be living in it.
This is from a
site called Global Research. I put the super scary parts in highlighted
yellow. Enjoy:
One thing the Pentagon
routinely does (and does very well) is conduct war games. Top brass there
are constantly developing strategies for conducting any number of
theoretical missions based on real or perceived threats to our national
security or vital interests. This was also done prior to the invasion of
Iraq, but the Bush administration chose not to listen to the dire warnings
about that mission given to him by Pentagon leaders, or for that matter,
by his own senior intelligence officials. Nevertheless, war gaming is in
full swing again right now with the bullseye just to the right of our
current mess – Iran.
It’s no secret that the
U.S. is currently putting the finishing touches on several contingency
plans for attacking Iranian nuclear and military facilities. With our
ground forces stretched to the breaking point in Iraq and Afghanistan,
none of the most likely scenarios involve a ground invasion. Not that this
administration wouldn’t prefer to march into the seat of Shiite Islam
behind a solid, moving line of M1 Abrams tanks and proclaim the country
for democracy. The fact is that even the President knows we can’t pull
that off any more so he and the neo-cons will have to settle for Shock
and Awe Lite.
If we invade Iran this
year it will be done using hundreds of sorties by carrier based
aircraft already stationed in the Persian Gulf and from land based
aircraft located in Iraq and Qatar. They will strike the known nuclear
facilities located in and around Tehran and the rest of the country as
well as bases containing major units of the Iranian military,
anti-aircraft installations and units of the Revolutionary Guard (a
separate and potent Iranian para-military organization).
Will this military
action stop Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons? Probably not. It
will probably not even destroy all of their nuclear research facilities,
the most sensitive of which are known to be underground, protected by tons
of earth and reinforced concrete and steel designed to survive almost all
attacks using conventional munitions. The Iranian military and
Revolutionary Guard will most likely survive as well, although they will
suffer significant casualties and major bases and command centers will
undoubtedly be destroyed. However, since Iran has both a functioning Air
Force, Navy (including submarines) and modern anti-aircraft capabilities,
U.S. fighter-bombers will suffer casualties as well. This will not be a
"Cake Walk" as with the U.S. led invasion of Iraq in 2003 when the Iraqi
Army simply melted away and the Iraqi Air Force never even launched a
single aircraft.
Not even close.
If the United States
attacks Iran either this summer or this fall, the American people had
better be prepared for a shock that may perhaps be even greater to the
national psyche (and economy) than 9/11.
First of all, there will
be significant U.S. casualties in the initial invasion. American jets
will be shot down and the American pilots who are not killed will
be taken prisoner - including female pilots. Iranian Yakhonts 26,
Sunburn 22 and Exocetmissiles will seek out and strike U.S.
naval battle groups bottled up in the narrow waters of the Persian Gulf
with very deadly results. American sailors will be killed and U.S.
ships will be badly damaged and perhaps sunk. We may even witness
the first attack on an American Aircraft carrier since World War II.
That’s just the opening act.
Israel (who had thus
far stayed out of the fray by letting the U.S. military do the heavy
lifting) is attacked by Hezbollah in a coordinated and large scale effort.
Widespread and grisly casualties effectively paralyze the nation, a notion
once thought impossible. Iran’s newest ally in the region, Syria, then
unleashes a barrage of over 200 Scud B, C and D missiles at Israel, each
armed with VX gas. Since all of Israel is within range of these Russian
built weapons, Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and virtually all major civilian
centers and several military bases are struck, often with a result of
massive casualties.
The Israeli Air Force
orders all three squadrons of their F-16I Sufa fighter/bombers into
the air with orders to bomb Tehran and as many military and nuclear bases
as they can before they are either shot down or run out of fuel. It is a
one way trip for some of these pilots. Their ancient homeland lies
in ruins. Many have family that is already dead or dying. They do not wait
for permission from Washington, DC or U.S. regional military commanders.
The Israeli aircraft are carrying the majority of their country’s nuclear
arsenal under their wings.
Just after the first
waves of U.S. bombers cross into Iranian airspace, the Iranian Navy, using
shore based missiles and small, fast attack craft sinks several oil
tankers in the Straits of Hormuz, sealing off the Persian Gulf and all its
oil from the rest of the world. They then mine the area, making it
difficult and even deadly for American minesweepers to clear the straits.
Whatever is left of the Iranian Navy and Air Force harasses our Navy as it
attempts minesweeping operations. More U.S casualties.
The day after the
invasion Wall Street (and to a lesser extent, Tokyo, London and Frankfurt)
acts as it always does in an international crisis – irrational speculative
and spot buying reaches fever pitch and sends the cost of oil
skyrocketing. In the immediate aftermath of the U.S. invasion of Iran, the
price of oil goes to $200.00 - $300.00 dollars a barrel on the open
market. If the war is not resolved in a few weeks, that price could rise
even higher. This will
send the price of gasoline at the pump in this country to $8.00-$10.00 per
gallon immediately and subsequently to even higher unthinkable levels.
If that happens, this
country shuts down. Most
Americans are not be able to afford gas to go to work. Truckers pull their
big rigs to the side of the road and simply walk away. Food, medicine and
other critical products are not be brought to stores. Gas and electricity
(what is left of the short supply) are too expensive for most people to
afford. Children, the sick and elderly die from lack of air-conditioned
homes and hospitals in the summer. Children, the sick and elderly die in
the winter for lack of heat. There are food riots across the country. A
barter system takes the place of currency and credit as the economy
dissolves and banks close or limit withdrawals. Civil unrest builds.
The police are unable
to contain the violence and are themselves victims of the same crisis as
the rest of the population.
Civilian rule dissolves
and Martial Law is declared under provisions approved under the Patriot
Act. Regular U.S. Army and Marine troops patrol the streets. The federal
government apparatus is moved to an unknown but secure location. The
United States descends into chaos and becomes a third world country. Its
time as the lone superpower is over.
It doesn’t get any
worse than this.
Then the first Israeli
bomber drops its nuclear payload on Tehran.
Here are some questions that aren't asked
or answered in this scenario. I'll ask them just for fun. I am an aspiring
science fiction writer afterall. What if Iran and Syria already have a dozen or
so tactical nukes acquired through the black market or the Soviets or Khan. What
would be the incentive not to use them? Better to die on your feet as they say.
Israel wouldn't use nuclear weapons first and would wait for Syria to devastate
them (graph 7)? That's because they've
shown so much caution and humanity in the past? Right. Would the United
States Oil Barons (disguised as the office of the Presidency) even allow Israel
to retaliate and possibly irradiate the oil fields? I suppose it would be karmic
payback for the United States to attack Israel after all the fine work that
AIPAC has done. What is the
scope of
the Iranian UAV program? How many do they have and what are their payloads?
What's worse, as I can imagine one hitting the block where I live, they would be
in the right. They would be defending themselves against
horrible imperialistic
American monsters. I couldn't even legitimately hate them. They have a right
to defend themselves as we all do. Finally, this looks like the
manufactured shock doctrine
that Naomi Klein warned us about in graph 12. It's a perfect prologue for a
fascist dictatorship. You would just need
leaders evil enough to initiate the story.
I'm kind of glad that the Supreme Court
ruled against handgun bans. Criminals would have access to guns because they're
criminals. I really think those bans are aimed at otherwise law abiding
citizens. One problem with the fascist scenario is that we're armed to the
teeth. Not that your handgun would do well against, say, a military helicopter,
but against Ravenwood
Blackwater types..... Well...better
to die on your feet. Related: Still think the solution to gun violence is
the mass proliferation of bullet resistant shields and body armor.
I
can also testify that getting sigs for Nader's campaign in Pennsylvania is
like pulling teeth. I would be shocked if he made the ballot. I really wish he
would redirect his efforts toward a relatively winnable senate or even house
seat. Could you run for governor first? On the other hand, does Obama have to
turn this far right? Or, as the
Field Negro points out--don't bother going
to Oliver
Willis for balanced commentary jeebus (he has to be on the Obama payroll):
"O" man WTF? File this
post under might piss Obamaholics off. But you addicts need to know that
your boy is seriously starting to piss me off as well. I mean honest to god,
why do I feel like I am being subjected to the Chinese water torture
technique every time I listen to the "O" man lately? His FISA vote. Drip.
His theocratic tilt. Drip. His going Sista Souljah on Father's Day. Drip.
His [non]-universal health care plan.Drip. Paying off the Ice Queen's debt.
Drip. And now this latest little gem. "O" man tell me you are not agreeing
with Thomas, Scalia, and the other supremes in the minority on this death
penalty decision? Look folks, I know that the "O" man has his own mind, and
we aren't going to agree on everything. Lord knows I don't necessarily want
him to go along with the liberal orthodoxy. But lately it just seems like he
is messing with the shit that I really care about. Things like civil
liberties, and keeping the church and our state separated.
Here's
how I feel about the bipartisan FISA compromise. Its just that I'm beginning to
think that if you have
dual loyalties (you want to thank the republicans for this great proxy war
against Iraq right?) or you're
a corporate dem
like Jason Altmire that you like being a bottom just a bit too much. From
Paul Conrad:
June 26
Well, I think the thing
that worries people, is that he did offer to be kind of a change agent and,
well, that’s not change. A filibuster would be nice. I don’t know. I guess
the question is if he can’t fight this why would he do the things that would
actually improve the economy (massive infrastructure rebuilding would be a
great start) or actually do things that would stop the war. Can he say he
doesn’t want 58 bases in Iraq or some horrible iraqi contract that the
Iraqis sign under duress?
I mean, the people that
like the war are the evil AIPAC/DLC duopoly
that runs the dems, or enough dems so that we can’t change anything
significant, or the rahms, schumers, Leibermans, hoyers and fords of this
world. Here’s a nice chance to show what a real deal change agent looks like
and that they won’t be running his white house explaining how we have to
fund the
evil war that everybody hates…Don’t get me wrong. He’s still better
than Hillary and McCain…I guess the question is by how much and is it
significant…
I
have been a critic of Mr. Markos but when he's right he's right. Fight back
against the FISA bill. It would also be nice if Obama, our presumptive nominee,
would stand tall on this one. I do think that this statement by Markos would be
scarier if he had added at the end: "We do not forgive. We do not forget."
When we started this "netroots" thing, we
worked to get "more and better Democrats" elected. At first, we focused on
the "more" part. This year, we're focusing a bit more on the "better" part.
And in 2010, we'll have enough Democrats in the House to exclusively focus
on the "better" part.
That means
primary challenges. And as we decide who to take on, let it be known that
this FISA vote will loom large.
Voting to give telecommunication companies
retroactive immunity may not guarantee a primary challenge, but it will loom
quite large.
We kicked Joe Lieberman out of the caucus.
We got rid of Al Wynn this year. Those were test runs, so to speak. We've
got a lot more of that ready to unleash in 2010.
Hoyer has a done deal, according to
CQ.com (sub. req.):
A final deal has been reached on a
rewrite of electronic surveillance rules and will be announced Thursday,
two congressional aides said.
The aides said the House is likely to
take up the legislation Friday....
As of Wednesday, sources said the new
bill would allow a federal district court to decide whether to provide
retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies being sued
for their role in the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance
program....One source said the federal district court deciding on
retroactive immunity would review whether there was "substantial
evidence" the companies had received assurances from the government that
the administration’s program was legal.
That means, of course, de facto amnesty
for the telcos. The federal district court would not be deciding on the
legality of the program, they would be limited to determining if the White
House showed the telcos a piece of paper saying that the warrantless
program was legal enough--which we already know. They're going to try to
justify it with that "substantial evidence" business, as if defining that
piece of paper as "substantial" somehow makes the fact that they are
directing the court to make its decision, regardless of the law, not a
travesty.
Call Barack Obama and urge him to make a
public statement reiterating his opposition to telco amnesty. His
opposition could kill this deal: Phone (202)
224-2854,
Fax (202) 228-4260
Call Steny Hoyer and tell him this is a
bad deal: Phone
(202)
225-4131,
Fax (202) 225-4300
Call Nancy Pelosi and urge her to pull
the bill from the House schedule: Phone
(202)
225-4965,
Fax (202) 225-8259
Call
your
representative and tell them to vote no on the FISA rewrite tomorrow.
The provision granting telecom
amnesty, Title VIII, has the exact Orwellian title it should have:
"Protection of Persons Assisting the Government." Section 802(a)
provides:
[A] civil action may not lie or be
maintained in a Federal or State court against any person for
providing assistance to an element of the intelligence community, and
shall be properly dismissed, if the Attorney General certifies to the
district court of the United States in which such action is pending
that . . . (4) the assistance alleged to have been provided . . . was
--
(A) in connection with
intelligence activity involving communications that was (i)
authorized by the President during the period beginning on September
11, 2001, and ending on January 17, 2007 and (ii) designed to
prevent or detect a terrorist attack, or activities in preparation
of a terrorist attack, against the United States" and
(B) the subject of a written
request or directive . . . indicating that the activity was (i)
authorized by the President; and (ii) determined to be lawful.
So all the Attorney General has to do
is recite those magic words -- the President requested this
eavesdropping and did it in order to save us from the Terrorists -- and
the minute he utters those words, the courts are required to dismiss the
lawsuits against the telecoms, no matter how illegal their behavior was.
That's the "compromise" Steny Hoyer
negotiated and which he is now -- according to very credible reports --
pressuring every member of the Democratic caucus to support. It's
full-scale, unconditional amnesty with no inquiry into whether anyone
broke the law.
As
people may or may not know, I've
filed a claim against Working America and their Pittsburgh canvass director Jenn
Jannon at the appropriate state and federal agencies. That will probably
turn into a lawsuit where I sue them for, oh, let's say around $3 million
dollars. I simply report this as a statement of fact, offered as a constructive
assessment. I've also been using the Power of Greyskull the
Internets to do some preliminary discovery because I need some basic questions
answered. So I asked this question, which I think was kind of a balanced and
neutral inquiry,
over at Indy
Media.
I'm curious about this community's experiences with
Working America.
I'm currently involved in some
litigation with Working America. Since this is the hub of progressive
Pittsburgh I was wondering what experiences people here have had with
Working America and their manager Jennifer Jannon. Or any of its field
managers such as Chris West or David Ninehouser. All experiences, quotas,
job expectations and overall impressions of the organization good bad or
indifferent would be appreciated.
PS: I'm also curious about the other year round canvass as well: The Clean
Water Action Project.
The reason I say it was balanced is that people could have
said wonderful things about the leadership of Jenn Jannon and her stewardship of
Working America. But I must objectively report that this has not been the case.
In fact, if the statements of these two anonymous posters are true--and I must
stress that I do not know for a fact that they are true but it would certainly
seem to be fair material for discovery purposes (and I have since learned their
names)--then Jenn Jannon is nothing short of a psychopath. I offer that last
statement as a critique and under the assumption that those anonymous statements
might be true. I look forward to deposing Jenn so she can set me straight on
this issue
You can read the entirety of their statements
here and
here over at Mirror Universe. Let me offer a few excerpts in case you were
wondering why the labor movement is losing ground.
Here's the first anonymous worker who offers his critical
assessment that I'm simply reporting on.
I Worked at WA
by Anonymous Tuesday, Apr. 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM
I started working
there in Summer 2006.
I thought that Working America, like most anything else, had both positive
and negative aspects. What was positive was that they were establishing
badly-needed community connections for the labor movement. The pay was good
and the work was interesting. I made many friends through the
experience.
But I also think there were big problems with the way Working America
operated. At best, some of the things
that were done made little sense in either business or
political terms; at worst, rights of both the
canvassed and the canvassers were seriously violated.
The most obvious problem is that rules were arbitrarily applied. We were
supposed to keep things "positive and progressive"; but Jannon would swear
in front of large crowds, sexual harassment was alleged against one of the
Field Managers, and anti-gay slurs were used around me (by an FM who thought
I would be "cool" with it).
This arbitrariness was particularly troubling when it came to things like,
say, checking up on addresses of
members. Jannon would claim that there were "red flags" concerning the
veracity of some canvassers' information based merely on whether or not she
liked them. This is evidenced by the fact that the very canvassers who
*really did* blatantly make shit up somehow managed to never raise any
suspicions. You are expected to lie to people.
We were instructed to tell them that it was "just for verification
purposes", which is not even remotely true. This is just one example of FMs
violating rules and encouraging others to do the same; this also extended
to, say, do-not-knocks, which would consistently be ignored.
There was also this troubling remark. You know, and I offer
this as a cautious "critique", when people within the office refer to you as
"Hitler", then maybe you're not a very good manager. You never know.
(By the way, "critique" is defined, for possible future legal
purposes in a defense against a completely baseless claim of a release
violation, this way:
1. A critical review or commentary, especially one dealing with works
of art or literature.
2. A critical discussion of a specified topic.
3. The art of criticism.
tr.v.cri·tiqued, cri·tiqu·ing, cri·tiques
Usage Problem
To review or discuss critically.)
It was rumored that Jenn Jannon had a
reputation as a
slave driver with other managers, leading them to
nickname her "Hitler". She hurled such abuse at the
previous office manager (the one before Erin -- can't
remember her name) that she would get physically ill
from stress, and eventually quit.
Oh my. How disturbing, which I again offer as critical
assessment. Now, this next person's statement, again I stress I don't have all
the information and Jenn Jannon certainly has a right to tell her story while
being deposed--hopefully under a series of three to five hot lights that give
off a painful glare and blink intermittedly--but if this statement is true then
this person would have a legitimate sexual discrimination claim against Jenn
Jannon. This is, again, constructive assessment or "critique". (See earlier
definition.) You might ask, if you're a woman, can you sue another woman for
sexual discrimination, or disparate treatment technically, under state and
federal civil rights laws. Why, as a matter of fact, you can! We learn something
thrilling and new here every day at Three Rivers Online.
The truth
by anonymous Saturday, Jun. 07, 2008 at 1:35 PM
I was employed with
Working America from October of 2005 until November of 2006.
During that time, one of the field managers had expressed a romantic interest
in me. I liked him a lot but he had a girlfriend at the time so the situation
was awkward and uncomfortable for me and I began avoiding him. I did not tell
the Canvass Director, Jenn Jannon, how he was acting towards me or what he had
said to me because I did like the guy and didn't want to get him in any kind
of trouble.
One of the other canvassers, who had noticed that this man was obviously
interested in me and confronted me about that, also noticed that there was
tension between the two of us. She then proceeded to spread rumors and gossip.
Around that time, Jenn had offered me a position as a field manager. I told
her I needed a few weeks to think about it and eventually I accepted the
position.
Then Jenn heard the rumors. I was called into her office and she completely
humiliated me. She told me I was no longer needed as a field manager because
she had heard some gossip about me and one of the field managers. I asked her
what she had heard and she said that she couldn't tell me because the person
that had told her these rumors had told her in confidence.
Later, I was informed that I was no longer eligible for cross train
opportunities because I may have to go on a cross train with this field
manager and she didn't want us to be alone together. I was humiliated once
again.
Although I hadn't done anything wrong, I was denied management and cross train
opportunities based solely on gossip and innuendo.
At a later date, Jenn asked me straight out what occurred between myself and
this field manager. I told her that he and I had a misunderstanding, that he
made comments that were upsetting to me, that he had apologized and that I
wouldn't discuss the situation further since it happened in a car, outside of
work.
The office temporarily shut down after the election in 2006 and was to re-open
in August of 2007. I decided not to go back since I presumed that Jenn would
continue to unfairly deny me management opportunities.
In the spring of 2007, I interviewed for a position with the Steelworkers'
Union. The man who interviewed me said that I was a good match for the job and
that he was interested in me. He asked if he could speak with Jenn concerning
me. I said yes because, since I hadn't done anything wrong and was a
dedicated, hard working individual, she would haven't any reason to not give
me a glowing reference. Also, it's illegal for an employee to make negative
comments about a former employee when asked for a reference.
The man from the Steelworkers spoke to Jen and then emailed me saying he was
no longer interested in hiring me. Clearly, Jenn had said something derogatory
about me which, as I stated earlier is illegal.
I'm thinking about getting an attorney and going to the press with my story.
Jenn Jannon works for the AFL-CIO and is attempting to prevent a single mother
from making a living!
Now, again, I don't know if these claims
are true or not, but if they are true--and they should be carefully investigated
by any organization that thinks itself responsible--let alone one that's
supposed to be fighting for the "working man" or "working single mother" in this
case--then Working America should fire Jenn Jannon, otherwise allegedly known as
"Hitler".
The reason why there isn't a viable left in the United States is that so many of
our institutions are very very bad to work for.
ACORN has massive problems. (They just won't or don't like paying their
people on time.) The PIRGs are run by Nader psychopaths. Grassroots Inc. seems
to be mostly a money making venture that cares not a whit about the rights of
working people. All of these critiques have
been well outlined in a book
called Activism Inc. Before you even attempt to work for any of those
organizations you should probably read it. A single mother. If true, then that's
truly horrible. I again offer the aforestated as "critique".
By the way, if Working America or Jenn
Jannon wants a say here, I offer
a place for commentary
here and the comments are also enabled at Mirror Universe. I won't edit what
you say but I will feel free to comment on any inaccuracies in the spirit of
"critique", defined earlier.
Related: I am very seriously thinking about starting a
field canvass here in Pittsburgh. I did that once before in Indiana but that was
before the World Wide Web. Now, with a lot of effort and a lot of luck, we could
become a Moveon like organization. The change has to start somewhere.
June 16
I
received a press release about Schenley High School. I'm going to repost it
here. This is from Tim Stevens and BPEP.
Monday, June 16, 2008, 6:30pm, Press
Conference
Pittsburgh Board of Education
341 S. Bellefield Avenue - Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Save Schenley Advocates "Speak Truth to Power"
CONTACTS: Tim Stevens:
(412)
758-7898
and Kathy Fine(412)
361-7904
Visual for Press Conference: Large Poster with Report Card that show grades
for the School District Administrators, School Board, Students, Parents and
Community.
ADVOCATES DEMAND THAT SCHENLEY HIGH SCHOOL BE SAVED FOR FUTURE
GENERATIONS AND THAT ALL SPENDING STOP UNTIL THERE IS A PLAN FOR
COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL REFORM.
Related: And Mark Rauterkus, my
fellow Penn Hills High School graduate, has been writing a lot about this as
well. You can find his comments
here,
here and
here.
Hunter, Blogger:
Unless he proves me wrong, Tom Delay lures children into his van with
candy, gasses them to death with bug spray, and uses their powdered
bones as an aphrodisiac when making love to all the animals at the San
Antonio Sea World.
Prove
me wrong, pal, prove me wrong.
On
a more positive note, I want to congratulate Republicans on finally coming
up with one (albeit inexplicable) smear against Obama that isn't just
codespeak or awkward polite-company placeholder for "he's black. Scary!"
Consider the recent dismal record:
Obama has a Kenyan father! (You know what color Kenyans are? Black!)
Scary!
Obama might secretly be a Muslim! (You know what color Muslims are?
Neither do I, but they might be black for all I know!) Scary!
Obama's middle name is ethnic sounding! Scary!
Obama attends a black church! With black people! Scary!
Obama needs to better prove his patriotism! (Waiver of proof granted
if you are a white politician.) Scaaaary!
Obama needs to prove he understands the middle class, like
[insert fabulously wealthy pasty white lawmaker here] undoubtably does.
(Because black people might not understand the middle class like rich
white people do!) Scary again!
Obama can't bowl! (You know who else can't bowl? Terrorists -- I mean,
black people!) Super scary! Obama's wife, this one
time, possibly was in the same room as Louis Farrakhan's wife! For a
women's luncheon! With black people! Scaaaaary! Booga booga booga! Look,
I'm holding a flashlight under my face right now! And there, on the handle
of the car door, was a hook! Aaaaaagh!
Translation of all of
the above: Oh
my goodness, this guy might be African American or something. But we can't
say that out loud, because it's the freaking twenty
first century and we'd look like giant, bigoted jackasses.
Related:
I talk politics n stuff with Maria over at 2 Political Junkies.
First, I start off the conversation with a friendly ice
breaker just like Clarence WilliamsPage on one of them
fancy pants network Sunday chat shows. (Imagine me wearing a bowtie!)
Has Maria conceded yet? Or is she now, after
failing to get the hard working white folk vote to rise up and/or some lone
assassin to do their duty, pushing for Hillary as the VP? Those are the latest
crazy time talking points to come out of the campaign.
Philip Shropshire
www.threeriversonline.com
PS: For the record, I sez no to Hillary as VP. Had she run a gracious upbeat
final campaign she would have been a good choice but her judgment has been,
quite simply, unfathomable. Good of the party? If she had the good of the
party in mind she would have dropped out in March...
Then Maria, who is either Cokie Roberts or the fortiesh Helen Thomas, offers
me a friendly policy based rejoinder that might even ruffle George Will's
feathers. Oh my. You never know.
Oh Philip, I'm sure you can wile away your time
waiting for that damn bitch Clinton to concede by publishing more porn. How
dare she make you wait! You should probably go back to your
Red Light District. Those women there are so much more willing and
compliant. They ask nothing of you and have the added benefit of not being
able to talk back -- or talk at all. But if that ain't doing it for you, you
can always join in the "why doesn't someone just kill that bitch Hillary"
fantasy of the guys over at CNN and MSNBC, I mean if you really want to
get into assasination talk and all.
Then, after carefully weighing the evidence and adding up all the
calculations she added one other ever so salient point:
Maria: Ok, so that's a no on the concession? And
did you have to insult the compliant splayed and often helpless women I post
over at the Red Light District? Have you, sniff (authentic Hillary Clinton
tears mind you) no decency ma'am?
Two: Here's a side bet: they'll be more women in the Obama cabinet than black
men. Those are the "fruits" of affirmative action.
And that concludes our little episode of Politics N Stuff with Maria at 2
Political Junkies. Not at all a bitter woman.
Late night June 4
A
cashier that I hope works at one of the Tri State's Targets. And now...
The African American
James Coburn? And
unlike certain republican presidents I'm pretty sure he reads books and
understands them...
May 29
Above:
What I would be reading online
if I didn't have a book review to complete by Monday. Below: my old
political activist buddy and ACT (America Coming Together) boss/partner Bob
Harris is making some waves in Atlanta, where I understand there are some
opportunities for the talented colored man. Bob is helping Ms. "Able" take on
Civil Rights legend John Lewis but from what I've read she's no slouch and John
has endorsed Hillary--even though he isn't a hard working and legitimate white
person--so the "legend" might be in some trouble. Wish Bob all the luck. Bob is
the skinny bespectacled guy on the left whispering helpful things into Mable's
ear Lieberman/Machiavelli
like...
She becomes the second
serious challenger to Lewis, the first being Markel Hutchins, a community
activist and minister. This marks the second time Thomas has challenged
Lewis. Representative Thomas lost badly in 1992 and won less than 25% of the
vote. Able Mabel is a serious politician having served in both the Georgia
House of Representatives and the Atlanta City Council. She is also a
progressive legislator having twice passed legislation to increase Georgia’s
homestead exemption to protect low income and elderly people from losing
their homes. She, like Hutchins, frames the contest in
generational terms, “I
believe that, at the end of the day, that my opponent is not only beatable,
but my opponent should — right now — just get out of the race and let a new
generation come forth.”
Go
watch. Great Tom Morello interview. Here is someone who, like Cory Doctorow, I
like more as a person than as an artist, even though he is a great great
guitarist. Funniest line: "As the other half Kenyan half Harvard educated
person from Illinois who isn't running for president..." Run Tom Run. I hear
there might be a senate seat opening up in Illinois...Related: Not that
impressed with the acoustic Nightwatchmen vid at the end. He's not a bad singer
and I like the lyrics but he sounds like a white guy from Illinois infected with
just a touch of the Pogues.
Hope that's not catching. Please keep attempting to create an American superband
like U2...
Brother Mouzone from "The Wire".
People
came to my door in Wilkinsburg on Memorial Day. I was hoping it was one of my
sleazier girlfriends but no: it was 6 representatives from my friendly
neighborhood Nation of Islam mosque, located just a couple of blocks from me.
Now, usually, when I'm confronted with relatively unintimidating representatives
of the Jehovah's Witnesses or the Mormons I just tell them flat out that I'm an
Atheist. If its the Mormons, then I would probably point them to the Hitch
history of The Church of Latter Day Saints
here and
here. If its the
Jehovah's Witnesses, then I strongly suggest and/or hint that you're a moron if
your religion doesn't allow you to vote especially if you're black and there's a
good chance that you could elect a black man president you poor deluded and
brainwashed fools. (On the other end of the galactic spectrum, my grandmother
Willa who is at least 90 and should easily make a hundred and who might outlive
me--have mixed feelings about that last point--actually used to and probably
still does invite the Witnesses inside to talk because she ran a
Bible school and she likes delivering the rhetorical beatdown. For her it would
not be unlike the feeling a Grizzly bear gets when a nice juicy salmon jumps
right into his lap...) But for some odd reason, perhaps it was because there
were six of them and I seem to recall that they recruit from the prisons,
practice and train in the martial arts and have gone into dangerous inner city
Wire/Killadelphia project drug dens and beaten up criminals bare handed,
that I was a bit less than my usual forthcoming self. Why, I even bought
a paper. Who wouldn't want a brand new issue of
The Final Call. Only a buck and good day
to you too sirs! Much luck in all yer endeavors of ridding the black community
of the yoke of servile Christianity and
replacing it
with an insane version of servile Islam that perhaps features better ties
and better papers but still with the
same self serving clergy and good things happen only after you
die attitude. God knows you wouldn't want less of that in the community. Sigh.
More on that paper if I have time later this week...
May 21
A Special Everyone Who Reads This Site
is Part of the 8 Million Main Corp List Due to Be Rounded Up After the Current
Administration's Manufactured "Crisis" Around the Internets
Some
of the ads over at Atrios are kind of right wing, with the worst being the Pro
McCain ads. Here's an ad (that I borrowed) that's more on point although I
don't think Atrios has ever written about the
shocking writings of John Perkins. I don't know why he can't. Short version:
before we murder the leaders of countries who don't play IMF ball we try to
persuade them with bribes. John Perkins is the guy who offered the "Or Else"
bribe. Read or watch all about it
here and
here. Related:
Recent Ellsberg observation that we prefer dictators over democracies if
that isn't patently obvious by now.
Okay,
on the something big is up and they're planning to send everyone away who
doesn't play ball front, we have two important stories. One, the US Government
has a list of 8 million "troublemakers" who they would round up in case of
what, I strongly suspect, would be a
manufactured shock.
After all, the people who conjured the shock have probably imagineered the
aftermath.
Here's a scary bit of that:
Under law, during a national
emergency, FEMA and its parent organization, the Department of Homeland
Security, would be empowered to seize private and public property, all forms
of transport, and all food supplies. The agency could dispatch military
commanders to run state and local governments, and it could order the arrest
of citizens without a warrant, holding them without trial for as long as the
acting government deems necessary. From the comfortable perspective of
peaceful times, such behavior by the government may seem far-fetched. But it
was not so very long ago that FDR ordered 120,000 Japanese Americans—everyone
from infants to the elderly—be held in detention camps for the duration of
World War II. This is widely regarded as a shameful moment in U.S. history, a
lesson learned. But a long trail of federal documents indicates that the
possibility of large-scale detention has never quite been abandoned by federal
authorities. Around the time of the 1968 race riots, for instance, a paper
drawn up at the U.S. Army War College detailed plans for rounding up millions
of "militants" and "American negroes," who were to be held at "assembly
centers or relocation camps." In the late 1980s, the Austin
American-Statesman and other publications reported the existence of 10
detention camp sites on military facilities nationwide, where hundreds of
thousands of people could be held in the event of domestic political upheaval.
More such facilities were commissioned in 2006, when Kellogg Brown & Root—then
a subsidiary of Halliburton—was handed a $385 million contract to establish
"temporary detention and processing capabilities" for the Department of
Homeland Security. The contract is short on details, stating only that the
facilities would be used for "an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support
the rapid development of new programs." Just what those "new programs" might
be is not specified.
Not scared yet? How about this.
These days, it's rare to hear a voice like that of
Senator Frank Church, who in the 1970s led the
explosive investigations into U.S. domestic intelligence crimes that prompted
the very reforms now being eroded. "The technological capacity that the
intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose
total tyranny," Church pointed out in 1975. "And there would be no way to
fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance
to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of
the government to know." UPDATE: Since this
article went to press, several documents have emerged to suggest the story has
longer legs than we thought. Most troubling among these is an October 2001
Justice Department memo that detailed the extra-constitutional powers the U.S.
military might invoke during domestic operations following a terrorist attack.
In the memo, John Yoo, then deputy assistant attorney
general, "concluded that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic
military operations." (Yoo, as most readers know, is author of the infamous
Torture Memo that, in bizarro fashion, rejiggers the definition of "legal"
torture to allow pretty much anything short of murder.) In the October 2001
memo, Yoo refers to a classified DOJ document titled "Authority for Use of
Military Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States."
According to the Associated Press, "Exactly what domestic military action was
covered by the October memo is unclear. But federal documents indicate that
the memo relates to the National Security Agency's Terrorist Surveillance
Program." Attorney General John Mukasey last month refused to clarify before
Congress whether the Yoo memo was still in force.
Meanwhile, congressional sources tell Radar
that Congressman Peter DeFazio has apparently
abandoned his effort to get to the bottom of the White House COG classified
annexes. Penny Dodge, DeFazio's chief of staff, says
otherwise. "We will be sending a letter requesting a classified briefing
soon," she told Radar this week.
Okay, go
read the whole scarier than Clive Barker thing. Then, or two, combine it
with
these two vids by Mark Crispin Miller. Scary scary stuff
as Count Floyd used to say.
(Did you catch the West Mifflin reference from Pittsburgher Joe Flaherty?) Short
version: if the republicans can't get McCain within 10 points in order to steal
an election then this administration would probably cancel that election with a
manufactured shock. Why would they do this: because they're guilty of war crimes
and possibly breaking every meaningful law that we have. They simply know no
bounds when it comes to evil. Remember: the Bush/Cheney crew stole two
presidential elections and murdered up to a million Iraqis and counting in order
to steal their oil. These are bad bad people. Worst ever, possibly.
There's no doubt that the GOP is in big trouble,
facing catastrophic losses in the House and Senate this November. But if you
believe that Bush and Cheney will observe the law and honor the traditions
of American democracy, and therefore let themselves be forced from power,
you're living in a world of happy dreams.
The fact is that this criminal regime cannot afford to drop their guns and
walk out here amongst the rest of us; and there's much evidence that they do
not intend to let that happen--ever. So we had better face that evidence
(i.e., unearth it, since the media has largely played it down, or tuned it
out), and brace ourselves for a protracted fight; because those men are
capable of anything that will maintain their death-grip on the US
government.
In this new vlog, I talk about that evidence (or some of it), and what we
may expect before Election Day.
PART ONE
PART TWO
You
know, on second thought, I would be a little disappointed if I wasn't on the
main core list. I mean, come on. I'd like to think that I would
"roam the earth like Caine" and fight the evil corporate theocratic regime
which will have elections when things have quieted down or "never". I use a
flexible definition of "fight" that also includes "running" and "hiding". Or
the Brave Sir Robin
approach to insurrection. Need to bone up on
my survivalism skills. Might have to do some running. Or I could just buy a
lot of guns. I think everyone should go out the
way the deaf girl did in
Jericho. I also think that whenRavenwood Blackwater comes into your home uninvited then
shooting them with a big shotgun is the appropriate answer. Related:
There is the possibility that there
will be a new Kung Fu movie that will hit theaters and torrent sites. It
wasn't until I saw "Dragon: The Bruce Lee" story that I found out that
Bruce Lee was up for the role. I certainly hope that the black directors cast an
asian or asian american into the lead role but in retrospect David Carradine was
probably a better actor than Bruce Lee. In fact, his performance as Caine was
one of the best performances on television ever.
May 18
One
of the arguments against Atheism is that some very smart people are religious.
Furthermore, it is usually argued that a lot of those smart people happen to be
scientists. Exhibit one in that argument is usually Einstein, who in his
writings (So I've read.) talks about God somewhat. I have heard of the "God
does not play dice" line. The Richard Dawkins argument, which
he makes in this Youtube
vid, is that Einstein didn't embrace religious thought in, say, the way of
your average pope or street corner preacher. It turns out that Dawkins was right
according to a recently disclosed letter written by Einstein. By the way, I
think the reason a lot of scientists and doctors and lawyers and candlestick
makers are religious is that they go through the same brain washing as the rest
of us. In fact, since scientists are often awarded for their superior intellects
why would they rebel against false ideologies? The system, and therefore God,
usually works effectively for them. They usually do quite well.
Go ask Ales Rarus.
Hey, we've heard theists cite the
authority of Einstein in service to their superstitions often enough:
practically every colloquial mention of a god by Einstein seems to get
reiterated to support a claim that he was a fellow believer. There's an
obscure
Einstein letter going up for auction that's got some juicy stuff to fire
back, though.
Keep this one in mind next time someone tries
to tell you that Einstein was on their side:
The word god is for me nothing
more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a
collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless
pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change
this.
This comment will start a few flames:
For me the Jewish religion
like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And
the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a
deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far
as my experience goes, they are no better than other human groups, although
they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I
cannot see anything 'chosen' about them.
Note, please, that Einstein's views are not a
final authority here, and you're nuts if you decide you should be godless
because Einstein was — this is simply more useful information to oppose
arguments from authority.
I have to be honest: after reading that what would
Einstein think of Jews with power, or a Jewish state with nuclear weapons? He
would probably sound a lot like Chomsky.
Where were the tough questions about the church's
absolute ban on contraception, condoms, divorce and abortion--even to save a
woman's life? If it was up to Benedict, we might be more stylish than the
plural wives of the FLDS, but we'd be trapped in marriage and have fifteen
children just like them. In the United States the Catholic church has lost
some of its moral authority--thank you, pedophile priests--but it has more
temporal power than you might think. Around 12 percent of US hospitals are
church-affiliated, which entitles them to refuse modern reproductive
healthcare to women. The church is the major opponent of the drive to make
health insurance plans cover birth control, forcing women to pay up to $600
out of pocket every year for contraceptives. Along with evangelical
Protestants, it is the main force behind every attempt to restrict abortion,
defeat prochoice politicians, make contraception and the morning-after pill
harder to get, promote false and sexist abstinence-only education and
discourage the use of condoms to prevent HIV by spreading unfounded doubts
about their effectiveness.
Catholic charities do a lot of good, but the Vatican
is a major obstacle to the advancement of women's human rights. In Nicaragua
and El Salvador it recently won a total ban on abortion that has already led
to dozens of deaths. In Chile it defeated President Michelle Bachelet's plan
to give out emergency contraception gratis. In Italy, Poland and elsewhere in
Europe it works night and day to make abortion illegal or hard to obtain. In
AIDS-plagued Africa its opposition to condoms, contraception and abortion
rights has cost millions of lives. None of this is as titillating as
pastel-swathed "sister wives" and their vast log-cabin dormitories, but it
affects almost everyone on the globe. FLDS men have many wives and the Pope
has none, which goes to show there's more than one way to keep women pregnant
and in their place.
Apparently,
when you murder the hot blond cylon and the hot blond cylon remembers that you
murdered her in a particularly cruel and ghastly way she's not entirely happy
about that. Not happy about you killing them like an insect or mouthing off
about how you would be happy to do it again.
Didn't know that. That was
the short version of last week's Battlestar Galactica (Faith) Related and
hinted at: When you create the creepy multiple-haired clones of oneself
there's a possibility that versions of you will be more than just friends. Edison Hate Future.
Agent
Ska, my fake virtual girlfriend who even now is starring in my lurid fantasy
"Texas Atheist Compound" ("Well, all the girls wear brown shoes and pink/blue
dresses here...It's our way Laura. Now as your husband/father it's time for you
to come to bed, but not before I've tilled the field with the 1993 version of
Bjork...." as read by the
late Lorne Greene.) has a
new blog. I'll probably read it occasionally. Nice
piece
of writing here. Now, has she really outgrown the ex-POG boyfriend or is she
just working her way toward selling out?
Very
scary article about Hillary Clinton's new best publisher friend Lex
Luthor Richard Scaife. Related: I should probably proclaim, in a
loud and public way, once again that I'm not a suicide. I may have many good
reasons to commit suicide but I'm a hopeless optimist. More related: Very
public statements that
you won't commit suicide aren't always helpful.
First
test for Obama: Say no to Hillary as the VP. I mean, come on. I don't care
if there are powerful
forces that want it. Related: Barack Obama would not commit suicide.
He's full of hope, not to mention the hot wife and the beautiful kids.
May 7
By
the way, barring involvement withbrothels with nazi paraphernalia and
the usual bad things that
happen to
black leaders, Barack Obama is the Democratic Party nominee.
Its the math. Obama might be able to win
it with pledged delegates if he gets a big win in Oregon. I also agree that Bill
Richardson, or "Judas" as he's known in Clinton quarters, makes sense as the VP.
He's likeable, shores up Latino support and he puts New Mexico in the win
column. That would be a real change ticket. I think Hillary has
run a disgraceful campaign which should disqualify her for the VP spot. Not to
mention that it would not be unlike having Lady Macbeth as your VP, always with
helpful advice I'm sure. But never say never in politics. My other VP pick is
Sherrod Brown, the new senator from Ohio.
Let's
face it: the wife of my blood
cousin on my father's side might be some kind of frackin' artistic genius.
Her latest paintings are also a tribute to the novels of Jules Verne. The one
above is called "Captain Nemo". Might try a more contemporary science fiction
writer though. Say, Greg Egan. Related: She
has also made the Youtubes.
Very talented woman. Somewhat Related: Mother's Side cousin Leonce
Gaiter, more masculine than Michael Jackson but probably not more masculine than
Prince, has removed his vids from the Youtubes. I wish he hadn't done that. They
were very thoughtful and sort of serve as a historical record. Ah well.
The real basic take away here is that if you are
going to tip elections, you aren’t going to be able to do it “one vote at a
time” as these voter id, anti-voter laws purport to combat.
You do it by rigging the system from the inside
- by massive voter roll purges that are designed to purge the very
demographics that are most likely to hurt the other party, by challenging
districting in order to “make it more fair for people’s votes to be reflective
of the district”, by implementing laws that are meant to keep millions of
people who are likely to vote for the other party from voting and by stacking
the deck in the positions where the voting machines are selected and
monitored, where the federal and state election laws are “interpreted”, where
the decisions are made with respect to voter registration and how the
elections are run and even having
cousins in the very media outlets who are calling the races for their
candidate-cousins.
Make no mistake - this is a more than just a major
partisan initiative. This is an all out assault on the voting rights of
millions of potential Democratic voters and therefore, votes. This is a
premeditated, long term, wide ranging attack against millions of Americans’
voting rights. But it isn’t just an assault on Democratic voters. It is an
assault on the most basic right that a democracy affords.
And it should be referred to accordingly.
May 4
One
more issue of one of the best comic series I have ever read. Two quick short
reviews: "You killed Dom! You bastards!"
And two: Most comics don't end with what looks like a nuclear
explosion....I also agree with
Wikipedia and the fan
page at
White Chapel: Tom Noir is still alive. He faked his death.
As
you may or may not know, there's a split over at 2 Political Junkies. Dayvoe
backs Obama and Maria backs the Clintons. It's getting a little testy. They
might be down to one political junkie in the future. Anyway, I left this comment
at
one of Dayvoe's posts where I speculate what would happen to the always
dependable black vote if Hillary were to steal the nomination:
Thank you for setting the record straight as usual. I
might note that Keith Olbermann is the most courageous newsman on the air today.
That he still has a job shocks and surprises me. That isn't to say that he's
beyond criticism but he's one of the few real friends in the MSM, (but) if
you're reduced to attacking him and not seeing that Scaife/Hillary lovefest
...not to mention that his paper is playing up the Wright thing (Obama knows a
scary black man didn't you know how awful...)
Question for Maria: Okay, so Hillary pulls out all the stops, maligns Obama
until he's left a bleeding corpse, buys off the remaining superdelegates (she
has the money of course being that she made 100 million off the presidency...how
Jimmy Carter honorable...) and wins the nomination. The black vote, of which I
am one, will then dutifully vote for the rich old white lady, who thinks
lobbyists is people too?
Well, I don't think that would happen. There would be a huge backlash among
arguably the most loyal constituency that the dems have. It would split the
party if she were to muscle the superdelegates into violating the popular will.
I might also note that every African American knows that if the positions were
switched Obama would be out of the race. Period. On the other hand, I suppose
I've always wondered if Obama has actually faced real bigotry, or a kind of
irrational hatred that reverts to stereotype no matter Obama's personal resume
of excellence. I guess he's learning about the kind of "america" most african
americans live on. Or: when you have a shot at winning we'll change the rules.
Why
Richard Dawkins, for no good reason,
continues to be a mean ol'
atheist. I mean, where does the man's hostility come from. Who knows.
Reality perhaps?
Interesting
conversation about science featuring hot woman who looks like a hot woman I
used to date (Or as I used to joke about
Christine: We both thought she
could do better.). If you really enjoyed the
film Mindwalk, then this is
for you...
Quantity
isn't the only reason people prefer the Internets over traditional media. A lot
of the time the quality is better as well. For Exhibit One: the
often incredible writings of
Agent Ska's brother, who's been traveling all over the world and he's not
visiting safe places, either. He's a
Year of Living Dangerously
kind of guy. I might note that what he does sounds like a cover for a spy (in
the movies anyway) but I'm sure he's not. (See
torture scene in latest
Bond movie...) Contrast and compare
this piece that he wrote with, say,
Ruth Ann's
latest:
As much as I like Sri Lanka, I’m not going to miss
this stuff - it was a cheap, guilty thrill at first (look! guys with guns!
posters of dead people! boy I ain’t in Kansas anymore!!) but it fades very
very quickly into dull apathy, occasionally broken by revulsion and, to be
honest, sometimes even real fear - standing alone on the side of a road as
stressed, heavily-armed police prepare for an oncoming motorcade, you look
around and idly ponder just how many ways you could die or lose a limb in the
next minute. Bomb or claymore mine in that open drain or that pile of trash or
tucked into the concrete lane divider; car coming from that lightly-guarded
alley ramming the motorcade as it passes by you; bodyguards panicking and
firing wildly as a sniper unloads from a rooftop.
Usually just a bloody-minded mental exercise, but
sometimes it escalates beyond as the time trickles on and there’s nowhere you
can go; the imagination accelerates its speculations, the brain imagines how
upset friends and family will be, if you get yourself killed, that you
stupidly put yourself in harm’s way instead of simply going by a different
route, and the pit in the stomach starts to overcome the professional’s
interest in the security preparation, convoy and escort packages, etc. Myopic,
cowardly, selfish, paranoid, ridiculous, melodramatic, sure, but that’s life.
Then the Hummers and troop trucks and motorcycle outriders and ambulances and
armored SUVs and darkened-windows limos blaze by, horns honking and lights
flashing and guns pointing, and disappear into the distance. And there you are
again on the other side, a bit sweatier, a little later in the day, looking
for a place to reload your cell phone account and pick up some cookies.
I also fast realized that much of the intellectual
interest one can take in the place is completely dependent on the fact that
you have a ticket out - for actual normal people with nowhere else to go (in
the broadest possible sense), checkpoints and propaganda and assassination
reminders are just hell. Hopefully as I come back here again and again over
the years things will improve. For my (but mostly their) sake then I’d no
longer viscerally feel “there but for the grace of God go I” as I walk, eyes
averted, past the jumpy 19-year soldiers visibly bracing when an unidentified
car pulls up to a sensitive checkpoint, the middle-aged men missing arms, the
civilians being dragged off their bus and yelled at by nervous police in Tamil
neighborhoods, and the galloping convoys trying to out-run the shadowy IEDs
that haunt drivers’ dreams.
Side
note: Looks like Ted Rall is back in this week's City Paper. I think my one
man public outcry turned it all around. Or maybe they skipped him for a week.
But I'm watching you City Paper..."in
brightest day, in darkest night" etc...
April 29
I
got this from the Prolefeed guy. I'm pretty sure the guy with the gun is an auto
insurance agent. Related
and hilarious clip here. Is it just me or is the Prolefeed as good as
anybody on teevee or in my newspapers?More
political stencils here. We can only beat them with stencils you see.
When
I asked Chris Potter what happened to Ted Rall I also noted--perhaps a bit
too obtusely-- that the Pennsylvania primary results were essentially
unverifiable. Perhaps it was really a 52 to 48 race like the exit polls. Perhaps
Hillary won by 20 points. Who knows. And who can check. Trust politicians
because they would never never ever lie to us, right Chris? Now, as it turns
out, they've been having this debate in New Jersey except its happening in a
courtroom. Get the background here from
Bradblog. Long story
short: Sequoia doesn't want you looking inside their machines, or the
machines that were used all over Pennsylvania last week and Allegheny County in
particular. (I could be wrong about that.) Sequoia had been fighting in court to
make sure that their machines couldn't be examined. That this would be an issue
in a real democracy is stunning. Then again, I suppose I don't live in a real
democracy. Anyway, super hacker Ed Felton is getting a look.
Here's what he's found so far. Remember, Fast "Eddy" Rendell
and our Secretary of State said everything worked fine last Tuesday. Compare and
contrast with these
graphs from Slashdot:
"Princeton Professor, Ed Felton, has posted a
series of
blogentries in which he
shows the printed tapes he obtained from the NJ voting machines don't report
the ballots correctly. In response to the first one, Sequoia admitted that
the machines had a known software design error that did not correctly record
which kind of ballots were cast (republican or democratic primary ballots)
but insisted the vote totals were correct. Then, further tapes showed this
explanation to be insufficient. In response, State officials insisted that
the (poorly printed) tapes were misread by Felton. Again further tapes
showed this not to be a sufficient explanation. However all those did not
foreclose the optimistic assessment that the errors were benign — that is,
the possibility that vote totals might really be correct even though the
ballot totals were wrong and the origin of the errors had not been
explained. Now he has found (well-printed) tapes that show what appears to
be hard proof that it's
the vote totals that are wrong, since two different readout methods
don't agree. Sequoia has made trade-secret
legal threats against
those wishing to mount an independent examination of the equipment. One
small hat-tip to Sequoia: at least they are reporting enough raw data in
different formats that these kinds of errors can come to light — that lesson
should be kept in mind when writing future requirements for voting
machines."
By the way, if you're playing the home game, this would be
evidence of election fraud. But remember, only dirty fucking hippies on the
internets think this story matters.
My
cousin Leonce Gaiter has made the Youtubes.He is out and gay so I
suppose as Eddie Murphy once described Michael Jackson: "Not necessarily the
most masculine brother in the world..." But he's much more masculine than Mr.
Jackson anyway. He also comes off as highly intelligent and thoughtful. I got
sort of a Malcolm Gladwell
vibe but without the funny hair. He seems to be doing these vids to promote
a book proposal. That's not promising. Perhaps he doesn't have a better agent
than me. Anyway. The vids are
here and
here. Part two features
a critique of Christianity in the black community, I think.Judge for
yourself.
I
see our cutting edge "alt" weekly The City Paper seems to have canned Ted Rall.
If you're keeping count they have gotten rid of their funniest and most
political cartoonists, Rall and that Tom the Dancing Bug guy, and kept on their
least political and least funny cartoons or Red Meat and that Derf fella. I will
try to provide where they have failed. Update: I'm
going to ask the city editor if that's the case or if it was just last
week's issue. I know Tom hasn't appeared in weeks. I'm not absolutely sure about
Rall.
From
Boing Boing. Also from Boing Boing contributor Cory Doctorow: He will
soon be releasing his
well reviewed young adult novel "Little Brother". And check out this crazy
premise: apparently, in the far off future, you'll be a kid and some evil
government will try to make everything that you enjoy doing over the Internet
completely illegal. Ker Razy.
I can't wait to read it when Cory releases the Creative Commons version of this
book in several days. It feels like 1984 with a viable resistance movement. Some
of us would really like to know how such a resistance movement would work. We
really would. Especially if it involves not blowing up stuff.
April 28
My
cousin Leonce Gaiter is
blogging again. This time for the
Huffington Post. He
apparently has a better agent than the person who is writing this or he's a
better writer perish the thought. He's back and he's pissed off about Obama.
"If the Pennsylvania debate proved one thing, it's the state of the political
landscape in which Democrats will compete come November. Unfortunately, we're
like the third act heroes on too many TV shows: The villain has tortured,
raped and maimed the hero's wife, child and pet hamster. The hero has the
villain dead-to-rights. The villain sweats profusely, trembling in fear. Just
then, the hero's trusty sidekick steps in to whisper to the hero, "If you do
it like this, you're no better than he is."
At that point, I'm screaming, "Smoke the Bastard!! Shoot! Shoooooot!!
I am deathly tired of the Democratic "we don't want to win like that"
attitude. I'm sick of being part of a party of losers with clean consciences.
I want my Democratic candidates to out-lie, out-cheat and out-steal their
Republican opponents. I want them to practice dog-whistle politics, send me
private signals telling me that they don't really mean a word they're saying,
and giving me confidence that their campaign soundbites are just lures for the
mob. I want them to assume the asininity of the bulk of the mainstream
television press corps (have you seen a TV news broadcast lately?) and use it
as opposed to being used by it.
I know. I know. We're trying to "take back the system." We want a better press
corps. I want to be 3 inches taller. That's not going to happen either.
Also related: The
Supreme Court upholds voter ID ban. I found the dissents particularly
interesting. Just for the record: no evidence whatsoever that Democrats have
used fake voters to win elections. Massive evidence that the GOP has used every
trick in the book to steal the last two presidential elections and at least one
house seat. This has to be said: A lot of Democrats weren't unhappy that their
party was robbed of two presidential elections. If you were upset, then you
might pass a bill that would change things. Related:
Dems failed to pass newest version of Holt bill. The bill required the
abnormal two thirds and apparently there is no plan to add it as an attachment.
That would mean you really wanted to pass a bill like that of course. Steny
Hoyer, the Dems number two, doesn't want to reform the machines because things
are going so well now. Kind of like when Biff got the betting results book in
Back to the Future II...I always wondered what happens to the people who live in
those awful splintered realities. Now I know.
And now: Time for Phil's Quixotic Musing...
I don't suppose the dems could attach something to that $100
billion dollar Iraq spending proposal that would fix our machines and outlaw
modern versions of Jim Crow?
Yeah, I didn't think so either.
April 23
New
Spirit trailer here.
More stills here.
Might be decent. What's with all the cats? No I never read the Spirit growing
up. Also part of the Acid Jazz Channel. Related: The Full Screen function now
works at the channel.
April 21
Given
the polls, Hillary Clinton probably shouldn't get more than 57 percent of the
vote. Booman actually thinks that
Obama could
win if the black vote turns out in Philly. Even if she wins by five points
that won't be enough. She really has to get to 63 percent. Here are two
separate stories on how easy it is to hack the Pennsylvania vote:
On Tuesday night, you will be told who the winner of the Pennsylvania
Primary is. You will accept it. You will have no choice. No matter who the
winner really is. Or isn't.
This Tuesday's crucial contest will be primarily run on 100%
faith-based, Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen or
push-button) e-voting machines across the state. There will be no way to
determine after the election whether the computers have accurately recorded,
or not, the intent of those voters who voted on them. As
VerifiedVoting.org summarizes the
crucial contest, it "will be essentially unrecountable, unverifiable, and
unauditable."
Most of the votes, more than 85%, will be cast on such DRE systems which
do not provide so-called "Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails" (VVPATs), as
their use has been found unconstitutional in the state, since its been
determined, accurately, that ballot secrecy cannot be guaranteed when using
such paper trail systems. Not that it matters.
With or without a so-called "paper trail" printer, all
touch-screen/push-button/DRE voting machines are equally unverifiable and
antithetical to American democracy. Period.
So, as with South Carolina's primary, so so long ago, and other states
since, whatever the officials tell you at the end of the election is what you,
and we, will have to accept. Whether votes are counted accurately is
completely out of anyone's hands at this point. It's strictly Democracy of the
Gods...
It's all a magic show, a series of illusions that can be manipulated by the
entertainers, also known as politicians, or anyone well placed and determined
enough to manipulate a system with few if any real safeguards.
The failure to discuss real issues is an insult to all
citizens. It might explain why a majority fail to vote in primary elections
and why 35% to 40% consistently fail to vote in the general elections for
president. A common refrain among those who refuse to participate is "Why
bother, they're all a bunch of crooks." Among those who do vote, there are
huge doubts about the honesty of elections. A 2006Zogby
pollof 707
likely voters in Pennsylvania asked this question: "Do you think the 2004
election was stolen?" Forty percent said yes.
The public officials who control elections behave as though the people are
stupid and ignorant of the questionable practices of secret vote counting and
outsourced elections. Wrong! The citizens of Pennsylvania know what the story
is. Just add the 40% of likely Pennsylvania voters who thought 2004 was stolen
with the 35% to 40% who routinely stay home because they doubt the system.
That produces a majority of citizens who have serious doubts about a system
created to serve the elected and not the electors.
The news media act like the people are a bunch of sheep who
buy whatever the media put out because some people actually watch the news.
They fail to note that in polls on public respect for various professions, the
television newsmedia
gets a 16% approvalrating.
The people who booed debate anchor Gibson are a perfect reflection that
attitude.
The politicians showed their respect for citizens after the 2006 election,
when the message was clear. Get out of Iraq. They have their excuses. But the
reality of the charade was made crystal clear in at the Philadelphia
presidential primary debate. While enduring an hour when no real issues were
discussed, did you hear either candidate criticize the news people for their
inane questions? Not a word.
I will attempt to pull the lever for Obama. We'll see. Let's watch very
carefully what happens in Philly's black wards.
But here's the best definition of what
Transhumanists want that I've seen. I don't find it all threatening. I just
want to get better with science. If you don't want to evolve, then hey
that's cool. Khan was just, you know, misunderstood.
I have seen a world
where death and disease have been defeated by science…
where food, shelter, and clothing is manufactured quickly, and without
waste…
where transparency makes violent crime impossible, and authorities
accountable…
where people walk on other planets and in endless virtual worlds…
where intelligence and empathy are magnified far beyond present levels…
where the diversity of sentient beings has expanded to unimaginable
proportions…
where the risk of human extinction has been reduced to near zero.
I will endeavor to take
the fastest safe route to such a future, and direct my present-day energies
towards its realization. I will be polite and understanding to skeptics and
naysayers. I will thoroughly enjoy my daily life while simultaneously
working for a better future. I will work towards that future for the good of
all, not just myself, and try my best to maintain an altruistic point of
view at all times.
Sounds good to me. What bothers you about
that?
Prolefeed
Has It Right: War is Peace. They don't even bother to hide their evil anymore do
they...
April 15
A "I can quit the Internets
anytime I want and I don't consider this an addiction but now I must search for
a few more links and don't touch that keyboard you see because you're keeping me
away from my precious precious links..." Around the Internets
What
I learned at the screening of Uncounted, Part II.
One
of the things that I learned at that screening is that there are proposed laws
at both the federal and state levels that could solve some of our voting
problems. Here's a rundown of the federal bill:
REP. RUSH HOLT INTRODUCES HR 5036
EMERGENCY BILL TO HELP
ENSURE ACCURACY, INTEGRITY OF 2008 ELECTION
Legislation Would Reimburse State and Local Jurisdictions
That Opt in for Paper Ballots and/or Audits
There
were a number of political reps that were supposed to show up but only one did.
That was Desiree Van Tassel from Chelsa Wagner's office. That was really
cool because I knocked on doors for Chelsa during her last election. Definitely
made me feel better about my work. The bill that would do some good here in
Pennsylvania is called HB 53.
It's currently stuck in the State Government Committee. People
in the know about state government told me that Rendell doesn't care much about
the issue and that he likes the machines in Philly just fine. Of course, this
brings up a much more troubling issue: if you support the candidate with the
least support do you really mind if she wins through voting fraud? Here's
another problem: suppose you don't trust Barack Obama on the issue of Israel and
I think that's the major reason behind his endorsement of Hillary. She's the
safe establishment bet. Nothing important really changes under Hillary. Would
Rendell care if the machines were hacked in order to give McCain the presidency?
Would Rendell care if HB 53 ever makes it out of committee? I was also told by
my source at the screening that I should take a careful look at the results that
come out of Philly's black districts.
The one question I asked is what state is the most likely to
be the Ohio or Florida of 2008. The answer I got was Pennsylvania. I hope
they're wrong about that. Then again, remember when the online registration
system failed? A system that was probably registering new and excited Obama
voters? Was that an accident? Troubling.
There
was a somewhat jumpy yet engaging CMU computer scientist on the panel as well
who terrified us all about the possibility that not only can you place your vote
changing code into our black box voting machines but you can hide it in such a
way that you probably wouldn't find it. Related: Computer scientists
across the nation are stating to
sound the warning about our
hackable machines, according to Bradblog.
Most
interesting rumor at the Uncounted screening: There are dueling party hackers.
Well, after losing two presidential elections and at least one house seat the
DNC needs new hackers. Related: Obama says the truth:
Gore won the election
in 2000. Four years from now we'll be able to say the truth about the 2004
election. MoreRelated:
Bitter Voters for Obama. I know I'm one.
The reason why a lot of the artists you routinely see on
The Acid Jazz
Channel are hardly ever played by both commercial and non commercial outlets
is that a lot of those artists, such as Frank Zappa and Nina Simone, even
Stereolab to some extent, have political points of view that the establishment
probably doesn't want you to hear or see. Zappa's atheism, Nina's strong support
of the civil rights movements, Stereolab's strong anti war messages etc...I can
definitely detect a pattern. Did you know that Sun Ra was a draft dodger? I, on
the other hand, have just one agenda: play the best music and art I can find.
Well, that, and left wing/atheist propaganda....
Two
big stories on old style centralized solar power
here and
here. This would be much better than coal or nuclear but I still think
decentralized power is the way to go. It's like somebody saying, oh in 1980,
that mainframes would be the future when in fact personal computing was much
better. I just think if everybody had a fuel cell or a wind turbine or cheap
solar cells that would be better.
The
American Peace Movement failed. It failed to stop the war and the subsequent
deaths of a million innocent Iraqis. It probably won't stop a war with Iran
where the death tolls--after speculated attacks on nuclear power plant
facilities--would probably start at one million.
The White Rose
Society, full of decent courageous people, didn't beat the Nazis, either.
The appropriate model now looks more like
The French Resistance,
if you don't mind killing people. If you do mind killing people, you might try
adopting the tactics of radical environment groups and start killing property,
but not just SUV sellers. You would target critical infrastructure nodes. John
Robb lays it all out in his book above and his website
Global Guerillas.
There are examples
here,
here,
here,
HERE and
here. You would have to attempt to stop the machine. I hope that Obama gets
elected and that he'll change the path but the Iranian war might have started by
then. There's a chance that voting simply won't be enough.
If they even count your
vote....
Please contrast what I've written with this
latest hard
hitting piece by Samantha Bennett. Then ask why people are turning away from
the corporate media and turning to the Internet. Plus I have
more tunes.
Doubleshot
of why, for reasons that simply aren't clear to most people, Richard Dawkins is
a mean ol' atheist.
Here
and
here. Seriously, when atheists start running the compounds, I want in on the
pre teen prospects who aren't allowed to leave because the outside world, with
their evil laws against multiple wives and child brides, is really really bad so
saith the Lord.
The world of "Narcopolis" does
bear some thematic resemblance to the dystopian futures described in Aldous
Huxley's "Brave New World" and George Orwell's "1984," but while Delano does
count both novels among his influences, the comparison ends with the
superficial. "The Joos so routinely imbibed by the citizens of Narcopolis is
certainly a kind of Soma," Delano said. "The language employed in the story is
less a direct reference to the Newspeak of '1984' than an attempt to have fun
and add value by portraying the evolution of language in both a social and
political context."
The protagonist in "Narcopolis" is an everyman named Gray Neighbor. "A
production line worker in a Narcopolis munitions plant, Gray's personal doubt
in the state is catalyzed by a vision experienced one day at work," Delano
said. "His imagination follows one of his products - a missile - to its
ultimate explosive destination on the other side of the planet. Neighbor's
disturbed response sounds 'anomaly alarms' in the halls of the security
service."
The task of investigating
Neighbor's abnormal behavior falls to T.R.U.S.T. Agent Angel Love. Neighbor's
actions lead T.R.U.S.T. to suspect that the factory worker is an agent of
BadEvil and a carrier of FearPure. Love's investigation proves inconclusive,
"but it does lead to a sexual attraction, rapidly requited, and Neighbor's
eventual recruitment as a T.R.U.S.T cop.
Here's
why Barack Obama is beating Hillary Clinton. This man is a gifted politician.
It's like watching Coltrane blow. Keep in mind that this takes place in a city
so white that when I visited it I was officially designated as a minority of
one. He still gets call and response.
Whole picture here from the Daily Kos.
Got
this from the email. There will be a tax protest April 15 in case you mind that
your tax dollars were spent killing a million or so innocent Iraqis. Full news
here from True Majority:
Tax Day is here again. As ordinary
Americans play be the rules and pay their bills, our government is continuing
to spend recklessly on endless war in Iraq: A war that has cost our country
dearly and brought America to the brink of an
economic recession. After five years, a trillion dollars,
and over 4,000 American lives, we've had enough. This Tax
Day it's time we change the policies of the past and invest in America's
future.
Our affiliate organization, Penn Action is organizing this action
on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 to tell Congress to stop spending endlessly on the
Iraq War and invest in America's future.
If
you're at all interested in the election fraud debate, then please watch this
Bob Fitrakis vid above. It answers the question of why doesn't the
mainstream/corporate press show more of an interest in the issue. Note the
shocking bit about how republican senator Mike DeWine killed the story at the
papers. Why would papers care? Because they would need Mike's help in order to
expand their monopolies in terms of all kinds of legislation and FCC issues.
That's why your daily Post Gazette gives you hard hitting pieces like
this or
this. Its to
distract you from the really important things that are happening, like how the
American public has been robbed of its choice for president in two consecutive
presidential elections. Features a nice retort to all the "election fraud"
denialists like Markos and a great definition of the successful newspaper
"editor". Related: This funny Smallville scene between Lex Luther and
Chloe, one of Clark's Scooby friends (I'm
thinking Velma.), seems
fairly realistic. A force of ultimate evil has taken over most of our newsrooms,
afterall. Unrealistic part of the scene: she would never get her story about
"office espionage" published and if she had kids to feed she probably wouldn't
have even complained.
April 4
A Short and to the Point Around the
Internets
Attended
last night's screening of Uncounted. I was the rude person in the back of the
auditorium who insisted that it's not even stevens in terms of election fraud
between republicans and democrats. As far as I can tell, the democrats have lost
two presidential elections and at least one House seat due to election fraud.
Furthermore, there seem to be a number of shaky results in the primaries on both
sides. The last one was Hillary's must win victory in New Hampshire. On the
other hand, the actions of the dems, who now control both houses, have been hard
to watch. Here's a scenario: if you even thought, even had a hint, that you had
lost two consecutive presidential elections due to fraud, wouldn't your first
priority be cleaning up the election system? Would have to be, right? Wrong.
Mark Crispin Miller has argued that he thinks the democrat party is in collusion
with the republicans. I have come to the horrible conclusion that he's right. I
think there are a lot of dems, especially Leiberman and his sellout ilk, who
like the Iraq war precisely because it is a proxy war for Israel. And if you
liked the war would you dislike the election fraud that brought you that war?
Probably not. In fact, you might be counting on it in order to continue our
glorious efforts in Iran. Why stop now. More on this when I have time.
Hosted by: VoteAllegheny and Pittsburgh Filmmakers, benefiting VotePA,
a 501(c)(4) organization
UNCOUNTED is an explosive documentary that
shows how the election fraud that changed the outcome of the 2004 election led
to even greater fraud in 2006 - and now looms as an unbridled threat to the
outcome of the 2008 election. This controversial film examines in factual,
logical, and yet startling terms how easy it is to change election outcomes and
undermine election integrity across the U.S.
UNCOUNTED is a wakeup call to all Americans. As we approach the decisive
election of 2008, UNCOUNTED will change how you feel about the way votes are
counted in America.
Please forward this invitation to others who
may be interested in seeing UNCOUNTED.
Related: Bob Fitrakis, quoted in the movie trailer
above,
can be seen here in a 60 minute talk broken up into about 10 segments. It's
pretty riveting and can be seen in bits at the Acid Jazz Channel above.
March 30th
A Very Special Internet
Addiction is a myth and I can quit the Internets whenever I want to Around the
Internets
On
the mark Tom Tomorrow toon on the very specious reasons behind Hillary's
Continued Run. Even features Hillary's "talk" withLex Luthor, publisher of the Daily Planet, (This is
actually the truth behind the corporate media. Reporters as scared children who
have no real control over what they write.) Richard Mellon Scaife, arguably one
of the most evil men in the United States. (Hometown pride (!) by the way...)
By the way, if you're looking for reasons to like Barack keep
in mind that it looks like not only does the Israel
lobby not like him (not for anything Obama has done because he's sucked up
to AIPAC with the best of them--
--(Real politic confession: if I was advising Obama, even as a
critic of AIPAC, I'd tell him to suck up to AIPAC. Of course, that's the dream
behind Obama. Unlike most black men who have woken up each morning angered and
frustrated by the world around them Obama could actually wake and change some
things. I truly hope he gets that opportunity.)--
--but because his middle name is Hussein and he actually knows
Moslems. He might be more sympathetic to the Palestinians than the sellout
Clintons who gave us NAFTA for christsakes...) but it looks like Jewish
likudnik
donors are
keeping Hillary in the race. I would like to think this wouldn't have to be
pointed out: if Obama wins the most elected delegates, in a system that really
isn't set up for blacks or progressives to win (Are there any whiter states than
Iowa or New Hampshire? The Dakotas maybe, Utah?) he should get the nomination.
If he doesn't, then it would probably split the party and give American blacks a
great reason to ditch the dems. On the other hand, this would provide Obama a
wonderful opportunity to quit the party and run as a third party. He has the
money.
One more point about that cartoon: I'm not that worried
about "meteors". I'm worried about bullets and
Mossad. Oh, the press would
cover it, right. Just
like they "covered" the RFK assassination and election fraud stories of 2000
and 2004.... Are you kidding me.? Also very much worried
about
Obama's plane going down...that seems to happen to a lot of political people
here and abroad.
Phil's Deep Thought, Not At All Related
to Atrios Deep Thoughts, which is Not At All Related to SNL's Deep Thoughts
(coming soon)
Okay.
Last Wednesday's South Park was one of their better episodes. It made fun of the
drug war, the recent Spitzer scandal and seemed to imply that if you get really
really high (mmkay) you will be transported to the cinematic world of
Heavy Metal, a magazine I particularly
liked in the late 70s especially as I was hitting puberty although the art was
fantastic as well. You can see a clip
from that movie here in
case you were wondering where they got the "rockin' tits" reference. You can
also watch this week's episode online at the official South Park site. Funny
stuff. (Moebius was one of the original fantastic artists behind Heavy Metal.)
Related: Current Heavy Metal story
that's online.
You
know, instead of boycotting the Olympics, you could show your unhappiness about
what's happening in Tibet in other ways. There is
a precedent for that sort of thing. I'm making the presumption that China
won't shoot you and send payment for the bullet to your family, at least not
with the whole world watching. I'm of the opinion that these kinds of boycotts
only punish the athletes and don't really change anything politically.
Had
I been blogging more frequently during the last week I would have pointed out
that Pitt had a marvelous opportunity to take it all this year. I guess I'm glad
that I didn't blog that. The NCAA basketball tournament: that's a hard
tournament to win.
So
I got the three in one cable deal a year or two back and I ended up paying about
100 dollars a month initially. Then when the reductions and rebates wore off
that ballooned to about $150. So I got rid of most of my cable channels (I pay
nine bucks a month for local channels, plus BET and the Golf channel, pretty
much two of the most useless channels ever.) I kept my Internet service and my
phone. It was actually cheaper to keep some cable channels as opposed to getting
rid of it completely, although it looks like I may have been given some
incorrect info from my helpful Comcast service provider.( An aside: I was
originally told that if I got rid of all my remaining cable channels I would be
paying about 110 a month for my two remaining services where if I kept some
channels it would be 55 dollars a month for all three services. So I chose
option two naively enough. I later found out that my bill would be closer to 80
bucks a month. Like I said: helpful, if you define "helpful" as a lack of
accuracy or candor. Looking into
Vonage as I type this...)
I have to admit I don't miss cable at all. I'm actually
physically angry over what happened to
BET on Jazz (
And Goddamn you
Reginald Hudlin.) where they turned one of the most interesting music
stations ever into the usual mediocre BET nonsense. I guess the white corporate
owners just couldn't stand all those articulate black men who weren't in jail
playing their instruments at a high level. We wouldn't want that, especially
since for some reason they're not in jail as outlined in
The Plan. Another reason, aside from bitterness, I don't miss cable at all
is that I can pretty much watch all the television I want online. Here are some
of the services I found and this is by no means a complete list.
Choose and Watch
(Not the usual cable fare but over several hundred channels. Plus free porn. You
shouldn't watch it because it repeats too often.)
Online TV attempts VEOH and
MIRO. I haven't even attempted to check out their vast libraries yet.
Hulu New attempt by Fox and NBC to put most of their television content online.
There are shows here that I haven't seen in years and are especially cool to
watch at night. Watching the Night Gallery right now.
Surf the Channel Doesn't seem entirely legal. Should I be able to watch Jumper or American
Gangster online... I'm just not sure.
The
Acid Jazz Channel The best music channel that I've ever made. I play mostly music at my music
channel. Crazy huh?
And that's not even a complete list. I even found Farscape.
This week, two of the shows that I would have missed, Smallville and South Park
(which puts all their shows online anyway.) I found online. Notice I haven't
even had to use Bittorrent yet. Besides, that would be wrong.
I guess this is the future.
In
(Some) Jews Against Obama, the Nation’s Eric Alterman has the most
in-depth roundup I’ve seen yet of charges leveled against Obama by various
American Likudnik Jewish leaders including Mort Klein of the the Zionist
Organization of America, Malcolm Hoenlein of the Conference of Presidents of
Major American Jewish Organizations, and a counsel at the American Jewish
Committee.
During the past few months a small
group of neoconservative Jews, many of whom hold key positions in the world
of official Jewish institutions, have been working to undermine the
presidential candidacy of Barack Obama with a series of carefully planted
character assassinations and deliberately misleading innuendo.
Alterman quotes Matthew Yglesias:
“First Obama was an anti-Semite
because Zbigniew Brzezinski is an anti-Semite. Then Obama was an anti-semite
because Robert Malley is an anti-semite. And now according to [Commentary’s
Noah] Pollack [sic] it’s Samantha Power who’s tainted by
Jew-hatred.”
As usual, attempts at painting Obama as
anti-Israel have had almost no traction with the majority of American Jews,
whose liberal views comport with Obama’s with quite nicely.
What exactly are they so scared of? Alterman writes:
Perhaps it is honesty about the issue.
Speaking to a largely Jewish audience in Cleveland, Obama explained, “There
is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an
unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, you’re anti-Israel and that can’t
be the measure of our friendship with Israel.” Then came his kicker: “One of
the things that struck me when I went to Israel was how much more open the
debate was around these issues in Israel than they are sometimes here
in the United States.” No wonder he scares them so…
Related: One hour Dutch documentary about the Israel
lobby, features Mearsheimer and Walt and another black politician that was
targeted by AIPAC. You know, if we had a legitimate black press that would be a
big story. If we had such a thing...
One
of the greatest bands,
ever, is reuniting this summer.
They say the time is right. I think the time is right and they won't be able to
play these songs for much longer. These aren't tunes for old men. Kneel before
their greatness here
and here and
here. Kneel! And avert
your eyes...This is, by the way, completely a Youtube phenomenon because Tony
Mowad and WDVE don't play this kind of music. They just don't. But if you want
to hear Harrison
Bergeron players who aren't allowed to jump higher and dance better on
commercial and even non commercial radio--also featured on the Acid Jazz
Channel-- go to Youtube. Watch
this and this.
Related: If you're looking for a kewl band name, then you can't go wrong
with "Death
Camp for Cats".
Get
your
Watchmen Pics right here. That's the Comedian by the way if you're an
illiterate person who hasn't read the Great Books...
Working
on reviews of Jericho, The Wire and school board piece that takes a deeper look
at Eleanor Chute's reporting. (One missing piece of a generally excellent "The
Wire" season: where are the blogs? Baltimore bloggers would have caught the city
hall lies, as Pittsburgh bloggers would have done, and might have been able to
piece together the homeless lie stuff, especially with tips...big hole there.)
Above,
simple yet beautifully elegant animation done to Koop tune. Below, Harlan
Ellison has been drawn into the scientology debate and he's extremely
uncomfortable with it. One reason I would think he's uncomfortable with it is
that he's actually a big fan of Hubbard's pulp fiction. I think he's the only
person I know who is. But, frankly, I respect Harlan's opinion when it comes to
literary matters. Now, at the very end here he talks about how scientology got
started and I must confess it makes the religion look bad. Dear Mr. Cruise: your
religion was started on a financial whim. It's an amazing bit of conversation
by the way and, while it wouldn't surprise me if Harlan gets this pulled in the
next several weeks, I really think it shows off Harlan at his most brilliant.
Man, the history that guy knows and has lived...
I was reading
this interesting Uncle Scam post and it got me thinking what note would I
attach to bricks or pieces of concrete that I've thrown through bank building
windows. Here's what Social Youth Chaos wrote:
“No entry was gained and nothing was taken,
so it appears this was the delivery of some kind of message by the
perpetrators,” Andy Oakley with Bremerton police said.
Police said the content of the notes were all the same and read as follows:
“Directions: Attach to brick and throw through window”
“Here is your brick back."
"Recognize it? You should.”
“It is part of the wall that you, as one of the elite upper class, have helped
to build between the minority ruling class, and the majority working class
throughout history. By flaunting your decadence, you have made yourself a
target.”
“Get used to it!”
“Social youth chaos-f___ s___ up!”
I came up with 11 such notes. This
certainly isn't an endorsement of perhaps justified vandalism against the state.
As I've been saying quite a bit lately: I have the same respect for the rule of
law as does the current president of the United States, perhaps even slightly
more, which probably isn't saying much. (Note to ineffective local hooligans:
Notice they attacked banks and not eco friendly food stores.)
Look, I read the financial reports, its
not as if you'll be standing here a long time anyway...
I'll turn myself in as soon as the
attorney general I appointed charges me.
I would appreciate it if you would ignore
this brick just like you ignore impeachment and a million dead iraqis.
Hey, I tried voting...
If life was fair, I'd get a parade and you
would be locked up for usury you bankin' bitches...
Hey, you said you wanted the house back
because I couldn't pay the mortgage...
Redline this!
And I'm not too thrilled with the
insurance industry, either.
There might be some anonymous people out
here who aren't just only upset about scientology. Just sayin'...
This is in no way a modern day cointelpro
psyop meant to trigger massive detention camp arrests, followed by
subsequent rioting and thereby a legitimate "shock doctrine" excuse to
cancel elections and permanently keep Bush in power. But if you need more
explanation call me at NSA headquarters, across the street from the book
deposity and remember the codename is "Operation Grand Slam".
I'll have you know that despite this latest attack against the evil
institutions of the state I still have more respect for the law than the
current president of the United States. I mean, at least I haven't killed
anybody, yet.
Looks like my prediction came through in terms of the school board vote. But
I'm not sure because both dailies failed to provide a breakdown of the vote,
which I suspect was on racial lines. Wouldn't that be news? Horrible lead by the
Post Gazette's Eleanor Chute who suggested that everyone who wanted to keep
Schenley open was in love with high school kids sniffing asbestos. I seem to
recall that they had some counter arguments Eleanor...more on this later when I
have time to write tonight.
Feb. 27
They
call him Wayno! Yet another
talented local artist.
And
we get local Pittsburgh school board press releases. This one is from BPEP. I
predict that the majority white members of the school board will outvote the
minority black members of the school board but I could be wrong. I also used to
think you couldn't elect a black guy president so what do I know. Here's Tim and
Celeste:
Superintendent Mark Roosevelt and Board
President, Bill Isler
Board Members: Heather Arnet, Mark
Brentley, Theresa Colaizzi, Jean Fink,
Sherry Hazuda, Bill Isler, Floyd McCrea,
Thomas Sumpter, Randall Taylor
Pittsburgh Public Schools Board of Education
341 South Bellefield Street
Pittsburgh , PA 15213
Dear Superintendent Roosevelt,and Board President Isler,Members: Heather Arnet,
Mark Brentley, Theresa Colaizzi ,Jean Fink, Sherry Hazuda, Bill Isler, Floyd
McCrea,Thomas Sumpter, Randall Taylor
For many years, B-PEP, the Black
Political Empowerment Project has been very concerned about and involved in
the issues of reforming
Pittsburgh Public Schools so that all of our children, in particular
African American children receive a high quality education. Our involvement in
school reform became even more heightened as a result
of the announcement on October 31, 2007 that called for the closing of
Schenley due to students and staff being exposed to asbestos where conditions
were continuing to deteriorate and the cost to remediate was prohibitive.Well since that announcement we have learned that there are other
options that can allow Schenley to stay open without ignoring safety and
weighing the cost with other proposed building renovations.On October 31st we also learned of other high school reforms
that didn’t come with as much details or public process that should have
existed for such dramatic proposals to be successful.
Our position today has been
influenced by attending many meetings, public hearings, information provided
by the Superintendent, his staff and administration, Board members, PPS
website, PA Department of Education, principals, teachers, students, parents,
news media, concerned community members, in addition
to independent building engineers, legal and finance experts.After weighing all of this, we respectfully request that board members
Vote NO or table all the items regarding moving
Schenley students separately and making expenditures to renovate other school
buildings.We ask that you Vote NOor table all aspects of this proposed High School Reform plan and not
move ahead with making any other expenditures until there is a comprehensive
approach to programs that address the needs of all students associated with
the 9 High Schools that failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress.Can you please share with us where you are with
that?Maybe those plans are somewhere in the ever growing
and changing documents connected to high school reform and we just don’t know
where to look for it or maybe it was in the information you received between
February 20th and today?
We agree with you and understand the
fierce urgency of now to ensure that ALL of our children receive a high
quality education, especially the many that have been denied that opportunity
for so long.It is good to see the A+ Schools plans for
community forums on high school reform beginning Thursday.
In addition to this we must focus some of our energy on figuring out a way to
reach and teach our students where they are at NOW.It
will be a shame to use the excuse that we were not able to make any
improvements for many of our students over the next couple of years because we
spent so much time devoted to only discussing not so well laid out plans.
Respectfully submitted,
Tim Stevens, Chairman and Celeste
Taylor, Vice-Chairperson
"Moving From Complaint To Possibility,
From Planning To Implementation"
The Black Political Empowerment Project (B-PEP)
Tim Stevens, Chairman
Celeste Taylor, Vice Chairperson
Phone:
412-758-7898
Email:
b-pepinfo@b-pep.net
Web Site: www.b-pep.net
c/o Hill House Association,
1835 Centre Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
I
discovered this at the Comic Book Reporter. Its a list of prominent comics
people in the City of Pittsburgh. That entire list includes every city.
Pittsburgh is here:
Looks about right. The above was drawn by
Ed Piskor, who
made it on the list and most deservingly. That's from a profile of
the Beats and those
panels are about William Burroughs, who apparently was a gifted poet (came up
with the phrases "Soft Machine" and "Steely Dan") but a definite wife murdering
drug abuser who you wouldn't want to leave alone with your kid, especially if it
was a young boy, who happened to live on the streets of Tangier...Go Beats! More
of a Ferlingetti man
myself, he didn't shoot anybody as far as I know...
I also highly recommend you pick up Ed's
latest work "Phreak": It looks
to be a kind of history of the early phone hackers, who were sort of the
precursors of all the wonderful Nigerian spammers and DNS types we know and love
today. The first edition looks to be a composite of the early life stories of
the two Kevins, Mitnick
and Poulsen. My fave
part has the fictionalized composite Kevin (I think.) rob the more famous two
Steves, Jobs and Wozniak, who apparently
used to make machines that
allowed you to hack phones. I suppose this prepared them to sell Apple
computers.
Song
I like. Fried Neckbones and Some Homefries. Those are the only lyrics we need in
these complicated times.
If
you missed Youtube for an hour or two Sunday afternoon, then blame the those
dirty Cardies
Paks, who while attempting to turn
off Youtube in Pakistan turned it off IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. Youtube is back
in the US, still struggling in the rest of the world. Remember, the mostly
Islamic Pakistanis, run by a dictator and owner of many nuclear weapons, are our
friends. Just keep saying that.
"You live in a country where it is illegal to express
certain mathematics in software, where state apparatchiks regulate all
innovation, where inconvenient science is criminalized, where whole avenues of
experimentation and research are shut down in the service of a half-baked
superstition about the moral qualities of your three laws, and you call my home
corrupt? Arturo, what happened to you? You weren't always this susceptible to
the Big Lie."
You
know, I've been mooching off of Cory Doctorow's free work for years. Never paid
him a dime. He's one of them information is free DRM resistance is futile kind
of guys who, and this is a credit to his fortitude, puts out most of his work
without charge. Go look. It's
true. I can't tell you how
much fun it is to
pan a novel when I wasn't given a complimentary copy. Still, I know of this
slight pang called "guilt". So, when IDW publishing started a series called
"Cory Doctorow's Futuristic Tales" I decided to say thank you by buying all five
issues of the six issue series that have been published so far. It was thanks
not just for having the courage to test his theory that free copies don't hurt
sales but also as thanks for his great copyleft reporting at Boing Boing.
They're not quite in the Alan Moore league or as courageous as Black Summer but
they're pretty good. The last issue, part of a series of short stories that
rework classic science fiction motifs (You might recall Isaac
Asimov's robot stories and his three laws of robotics...Warren Ellis has his
own version of the three laws which
are funny and will probably be true.) is definitely the best, fully realized
of the batch. It also recycles a common meme in Cory's work or the idea that you
might be able to upload your consciousness into other bodies. Or: we would
become the Cylons, or at least the ones who can pass for humans. Terrific read.
I also was quite impressed with Nimby and the Dimension Hoppers. The covers
have been beautiful as well. Highly recommended. And: thanks Cory for showing us
a new way. I'm not sure if he's one of the best science fiction writers but he's
certainly one of the best people in science fiction.
Brilliant
Prolefeed Video About Election Fraud
Bradblog is
onto something when it comes to
the irresponsibility of the Daily Kos
about the election integrity debate. The record of
Markos and his gang of election fraud
denialists (phrase courtesy of Mark Crispin Miller.) is simply horrible.
We've tried the DNC establishment/Markos technique of simply ignoring the
problem and hoping that it will go away in 2000 and 2004. That simply didn't
work. Democrats, or at least Democrats who don't secretly like the results of
the 2000 and 2004 election that screws the working fella base of the party,
should assume that the election is guilty until proven innocent by both
verifiable ballot and open auditing that we can all see. In fact, you should be
pissed off about it and you should even "hyperventilate" some.
Now, thanks to the Youtubes, which we can
find on the Internets, someone explains the problem in a simple way that even
Markos Moulitsas and his election fraud denialist attack hack Dana Houle can
easily understand. God Knows they won't read and probably can't comprehend the
half dozen excellent largely unrebutted books written by Bob Fitrakis, Mark
Crispin Miller, Greg Palast, a number of statisticians and even one Kennedy.
Here it is in moving pictures.
You know, this is pretty funny but from what
I've seen I'm pretty sure it isn't a joke.
Bottom Line: If you've lost two consecutive presidential elections
because of voter suppression of the DNC base, then you might want to counteract
those efforts in 2008. That means not calling election integrity movement
leaders "nutters" and not banning people who bring these issues up at your
"forum". You might even take a hand in pushing for a stronger Holt bill. Both
Fitrakis and Kathy Dopp have outlined solutions. Unless you're on the other side
of course. And, I have to admit, I sometimes wonder
if Markos did
take that CIA job. There were old school media persons who were
Company Men in the past, why not New Media men,
who were once republicans, on the payroll as well? Remember: all of the
glitches seem to benefit republicans and/or the most conservative of democratic
candidates. It would be nice if the Great Orange Satan could catch a clue.
Feb. 18
One
of the most effective campaigns of subversion, ever. And scientology is kind of
evil and well deserving of this.
Feb. 15
Let's
be honest. Those anonymous
vids are both scary and inspired. They also seem to spark
real action. I guess it
would be asking too much for the Green Party to pull something off like that. I
also think they're comics fans. Aren't there two comics allusions...the "be
wary" phrase comes from "V for Vendetta" and the cut down one and ten will
replace it seems to be taken from the
mantra of Hydra: "Cut off one
arm and two will replace it." Hydra was the main nemesis of Shield, at least
when Steranko drew it. The Internets is the modern counterculture. Don't let
anybody tell you different. (One question for anonymous, who is legion: why stop
at scientology? Why not Mormonism or the pope or thoroughly evil republicans?
Just a thought....)
Speaking
of the Green Party, what the fuck is wrong with the Green Party? They're
planning on running a candidate against Mike Doyle, arguably the most
progressive congressman in the state (look
at his record.). If they do really well they won't win but they could tip
the race to the hideous republican, which is the reality of the winner take all
system. Are they planning on ever contesting a mayor's race again? If they had
attacked the last Pittsburgh's mayor's race with funding and, you know, a
candidate, I just think they would have gotten a lot of support. I don't
understand their strategy. Why can't they raise money from small donors? What
is their strategy? Annoying and quixotic presidential runs only?. Related:
Did you know that there are other third parties out there? I didn't. Until
yesterday. Let's all read about the
Working Families
Party and
The United States Labor Party, not to be confused with wacko Lyndon
Larouche's Labor Party, probably a psyop to discredit a decent labor party.
Washington
state GOP starts stealing elections
from other Republicans now.
Bradblog describes one of the main guys involved as Essor the Suppressor, who
apparently has ties to the McCain campaign. I've seen this movie before in Ohio
2004 and Florida 2000. Expect high profile election fraud denialists like Markos
and Atrios to continue their winning strategy of keeping their head in their
sands or other parts of their bodies.
Speaking
of Markos and a wrapup of election fraud during the primary season, Bradblog has
the lowdown:
Daily Kos' Markos Moulitsas Attacks Election Integrity, Irresponsibly, Yet
Again
The World's Most-Read 'Progressive' Blogger Continues to Misinform His
Readers, Seems to Have No Understanding of How Our Electoral System Works (or
Doesn't)...
With "friends" like Markos Moulitsas at Daily Kos, Democrats may not need
Republicans to help them lose this year. Once again, the namesake of the
largest supposedly-Progressive blogsite in the world misleads his readers,
confuses issues of Election Integrity with unmade allegations of "conspiracy
theories," and otherwise makes all-new extraordinary claims which are wholly
unsupported by any evidence, extraordinary or otherwise.
Read the Whole thing here. To
repeat: it's pretty much impossible to verify your vote in the United States and
its very difficult to get accurate recounts.
The
City Paper's
Chris Potter blogs. Not as good as Atrios or Chad Hermann but give him time.
Weeks ago I wondered aloud why every staffer at the City Paper isn't blogging
and getting a split of ad revenue. I imagine they'll get to blog but without
that annoying extra pay.
Just
a song I like that I just keep hitting replay on.
Feb. 12
One
of the most original American writers who ever lived
died yesterday. His name was
Steve Gerber and truth be told he was one of the few American comics
writers who was in the same extraordinary league as this new and annoyingly
gifted Ellis/Moore Brit class of scribes that has taken over our shores--in
quality anyway. If you can find them, and now a lot of his work is in
collections, I highly recommend his Howard the Ducks (Highlighted, for me
anyway, by Howard's presidential run in 1976 and Dr. Bong, the first journalist
as super villain, in comics anyway.) But they were all special. One of the
issues was so good that Stan Lee even wrote him a fan letter. Steve's
Defenders run--which featured a black man essentially enabling the plotline
of the Turner Diaries, My
Mother the Badoon and a pipe smoking lesbian senatorial candidate, just
stunning stuff--was also quite impressive. This is also when I noticed that it
matters who writes these things. When Steve Gerber left those particular titles
they simply weren't as good. I'm still insulted that Marvel thought that hack
Bill Mantlo could replace Steve on Howard the Duck, a creation that only worked
with is creator. Steve Gerber was also one of the first comics guys to fight for
creator rights and probably helped usher in creator owned comics.
Steve also left behind some of the most
frustrating dangling plotlines ever.
The only two issues of Void Indigo are astonishing. But then
the series was cancelled. Never got to read what half this stuff meant. Just
look at that cover. And then
there was this guy who showed up in Defenders (link fixed.)to randomly shoot
people:
Never explained, probably because Steve Gerber sued Marvel. I
know he knew what it meant and how it tied into the Defenders but that secret
will go with him into the grave. I guess he didn't want Bill Mantlo to mess it
up. Steve's fiction, to me, had it all. There was never anybody who could mix
the fantastic with the real so effortlessly, and make it funny too. He will be
missed.
Related: On a macabre note that Steve would have
appreciated and that we will see more of Here in the Future you can kind
of watch Steve blog his own death.
I like to think I would be as matter of fact about it. More Related:
Good interview
with Steve about his work. More Related:
Obit
of Steve by the Comics Reporter and a
collection of reflections from across the Internets.
Feb. 10
Forgot
where I got this but yeah that's about right. And why Richard Dawkins is a mean
ol' atheist is completely legitimate in regards to
Sharia Law, don't forget that whenever mideastern countries elected more
liberal candidates we usually had them killed and replaced with our compliant
Saddam/Shah like henchman. Let's face it: Religious doctrine and
authoritarianism go great together. Related: And let's not forget
why
Richard Dawkins is a mean ol' atheist.MoreRelated: Angry
Palestinian rap vid (tip of the hat to Uncle Scam at American Samizdat).
Anyone that reads this blog knows that I am pulling for Barack Obama and
that I have low personal regard for Mrs. and Mr. Clinton. So, yeah, I am
biased. But Obama won the night tonight by every available measure. Chuck Todd
on MSNBC has done the national delegate estimate (using the most optimistic
Clinton campaign projections for California) and got: Obama 841 Clinton 837.
It will probably be a slightly larger lead for Obama, but not more than 15-20
additional delegates.
Obama didn't just win the delegate battle, he won the states battle.
Obama won (14) Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Missouri,
Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Alaska.
Clinton won (8) New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Arkansas,
California, Arizona, and Oklahoma.
Then there is the expectations game. Obama had two big upsets in
Connecticut and Missouri, while Clinton had none.
The next set of primaries favors Obama. Of course, it will
never be an inevitable win for the first viable African American candidate.
Even
The Great Orange Satan has it right:
So how will this shake out? Beats me. But task one is for Obama to
survive this Tuesday. If he does, task two is for Hillary to survive this
month. If she does, then they both have to survive the mini-Super Tuesday on
March 4th. If they do, this thing goes to Pennsylvania. Or to North Carolina.
Or to the convention.
You
know, when I was growing up as a young black man, other older African Americans
would say something to me at various times, usually at church or a social
function. And what they often said was "We are not loved." Just out of the blue.
I always wondered what that meant as a young person full of optimism, back then
anyway. Now, as a grumpy older black person, and winner of about $20000 grand
from discrimination lawsuits against two allegedly "liberal" institutions, I
now realize that was a slightly more subtle way of saying "We are a deeply hated
people". Last hired, first fired. Watch as black men with college degrees get
turned away from the job while the white man who uses yinz as a noun and no high
school diploma not only gets the job but also gets the promotion. If you're a
lucky black person, you might even get to train him. I live in a country where
black men are, really, if you look at it, groomed for the prison system and/or
low grade wage slavery where you never ever get to get out.
That's why I didn't originally endorse
Obama. We're not loved. Really. I still think the safest bet was John Edwards.
You run a risk nominating either a woman or an African American to the
presidency. But if it's a choice between the Clintons and Obama, then Obama
is clearly the better choice. Both have strongly hinted that they're
corporate dems which means, probably, very little changes in the lives of
ordinary Americans. On the other hand, I think that when the Democratic Party
controls the White House then things can get a little better. Sane people on the
courts would be nice too.There would be no Americorps if Bill Clinton hadn't
become president. True, when I worked for Americorps I worked at a church which
is as symbolic of the Clinton legacy as anything (I never told any of my
students to pray though. I told them to think their way out of problems).
Remember: The Clintons left the country in the hands of fascist republicans and
a cave in mentality that has really turned both parties into the servants of the
Republican ruling classes. I guess I've seen what the Clintons have done--and I
also have this sneaky feeling that they didn't mind losing democratic party
majorities in both houses because it strengthened the presidency and their own
personal war against the party's base--and I think its time to give a family
other than Bush or Clinton a chance to do good or even ill. Couldn't do any
worse quite frankly.
One
more thing on why the Edwards choice wasn't only the most progressive choice,
but the safest. If you were appalled by the tactics of the Clintons (okay mostly
Bill. He loves his hawt wife. Who knew.), then just wait for the GOP onslaught.
Expect Obama's middle name to be used in all of those unauthorized yet effective
527 ads. Horrible stuff. I mean, I think the country is ready for a big change
but it won't be easy. Not to mention that the country's real terrorist threat
comes from the American right. They're the ones who kill with impunity. I like
to think those Nazi Stormfront groups will just sit on their hands
and blog about it, terrified of secret service protection but I doubt
it....
Mittens
dropping out isn't good. Mike Huckabee is a nightmare candidate in that he's
completely likeable, strikes me as authentic (non McCain trophy wife and all...)
and the Republican wall streeters hate him. Now Mike gets a one on one race with
McCain, or Bob Dole II, who I think is a very beatable candidate in a general
election. I'd much rather face Bob Dole II in a general election than Mike
Huckabee. Not that I would vote for MIke. See
here and
here. More GOP
awfulness...Related:
Why Richard Dawkins is a mean ol' atheist.
Must
read by Peter Bagge on The
War Against Fornication. One weird aspect to this story: one of the
evildoers pushing these Taliban laws here
is a board member of
Reason! How is that possible? What kind of libertarian is that? If you
didn't know, Reason is the mouthpiece of the American Libertarian movement.
Must
read by Peter Bagge on The
War Against Fornication. One weird aspect to this story: one of the
evildoers pushing these Taliban laws here
is a board member of
Reason! How is that possible? What kind of libertarian is that? If you
didn't know, Reason is the mouthpiece of the American Libertarian movement.
Jan. 30
The
art of John Picacio, again. Here's
his blog. Everybody has a blog I reckon'. (I'm watchin' a western.).
Well
that was a long break. Kind of depressed about Edwards dropping out. But,
hopefully, barring an unexaggerated death, I will post with a bit more frequency
than Khari Mosely, who last
posted in
December 2006, but who has recently appeared to
say something nice about Barack Obama. Welcome back Khari. Try not to take
two years between posts.
At long last,
more and more ordinary Americans are getting the message that they have been
lied to, that they can no longer trust the mainstream media, that their public
treasury has been looted, that their children’s and grandchildren’s future has
been mortgaged, and that they are living under the darkening shadow of
despotism.
Still the establishment MICMC rolls on in its arguably pre-determined course,
“populism” and the public be damned.
Matt Taibbi on
Bill Maher’s “Real Time” last Friday summed it up perfectly:
The
[campaign] theme for awhile was that the voters were sick and tired of being
told by the media who was going to be their nominee. But it seems to have
come full circle now, and it looks like we may end up getting the same
people we were going to get in the first place: [McCain and Clinton]....
Seventy percent of the country wants to withdraw from Iraq, and we get two
pro-war candidates. If that doesn’t tell you how f****d-up the system is, I
don’t know what does.
So we are now
at a crossroads. Here, for what it's worth, are two scenarios: To the right,
we get McCain vs. Clinton and more of the same, whoever wins. If these are
the candidates, Hillary will get a media pounding that will make the Swift
Boats seem like a luxury cruise. The GOP will nominate McCain and a “smart
Bush” – maybe Giuliani or even (God forbid!) Cheney – for Veep. The GOP/MSM
noise machine will bring the McCain poll numbers upward toward 45%, which is
close enough for Diebold, et. al, to do the rest. McCain, age 72, will
win and after a year or two, retire “for health reasons.” Bush’s “enabling
acts” will still be in place, and ... – the rest is too horrible to
contemplate.
To the left, the public demand for change becomes irresistible. Edwards is
nominated, or perhaps Obama with a populist enthusiasm not clearly evident
today. A populist/Democratic tsunami overwhelms the black-box voting machines,
a Democrat moves into the White House, and the Democrats take substantial
control of Congress. By then, the Bush depression may be upon us, opening the
door to substantial social, economic and political reform.
The latter scenario can not happen without a massive outpouring of public
anger and demand for substantial change. If that anger is contained, we remain
on a rightward course. If it breaks loose and the Bastille falls, all bets are
off. It's in the hands of we the people.
Hold on tight: it’s going to be a rough ride ahead!
Eulogy
for Prop Joe: I guess I was hoping that there would be more seasons of The
Wire but what's the point if you keep killing off my favorite characters. I
always thought Prop Joe was the decent gangster. This probably ends the Meet Up
as Marlo just goes about killing anyone who stands in his way. So much for the
genteel Baltimore black mob. On the other hand, it looks like Omar the Dark
Avenger is back in town. I really think Marlo deserves Omar's vengeance more
than what he'd get from the police. I also find the stories on the newsroom to
be interesting. It certainly brings back memories and very few of them good.
More on that when I have time...
Jan. 20
Must
listen to
Democracy Now interview with David Cay Johnston. In case you're wondering
why poor people can't move back to New Orleans and why the Hill District gets
nothing for development while the Pens get millions in tax breaks...
An excerpt:
MY GOODMAN: Explain the wealth
transfer.
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: Well, I was
struck, listening to the program from Kenya, where they talked about the
president and his power to give money to people, give land, and that’s why many
people identify with it. We have created in the United States, largely in the
last thirty years, a whole series of programs—a few of them explicit, many of
them deeply hidden—that take money from the pockets of the poor and the middle
class and upper middle class and funnel it to the wealthiest people in America.
And among the biggest recipients of these subsidies are the wealthiest family
America, the Waltons; George Steinbrenner; Donald Trump; a whole host of
healthcare billionaires. And these are policies that either have not been
reported on or the news reporting on them generally has not informed people
about what they really are.
And for those of us watching what's happening on the Hill:
JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, I was
struck—you have numerous chapters in the book on the various aspects of this
transfer, but I was especially struck by your material on the New York Yankees
and Steinbrenner and Joyce Hogi, who you mention in the book, who I know well,
and this whole issue of sports teams across America and how the public is
subsidizing them. Could you elaborate on that part of it?
DAVID CAY JOHNSTON: Sure. George Steinbrenner is getting over $600 million for
the new Yankee Stadium in New York. The New York Mets are getting over $600
million. In fact, the City of New York gave them money to lobby against the
taxpayers to get more money. Rudy Giuliani gave $50 million to the two teams for
that purpose. The new owners of the Washington Nationals baseball team in Washington, D.C.,
paid $450 million for the team. But, in fact, they got the team for free,
because the subsidy they’re getting for the new stadium is worth $611 million.
We actually paid these people to buy the team.
Now, in this country right
now, we are spending $2 billion a year subsidizing the big four sports:
baseball, basketball, football and hockey. It accounts for all of the profits of
that industry and more. Now, there may be individual teams that make money, but
the industry as a whole is not profitable. And that’s astonishing because the
big four leagues are exempt from the laws of competition. By the way, irony is
not dead, because here are people who are in the business of competition on the
field who are exempted by law from the rules of economic competition.
If you go to England and you
want to start a soccer team, they have to let you join the soccer league. There
are thirteen commercial soccer teams in the London area. New York City, the
biggest city in the country, there are two baseball teams, because there’s no
free entry into the market. In Los Angeles, there’s no football team. And the
owners use this power to prevent others from owning teams, to prevent municipal
governments from owning teams, to prevent nonprofits from owning teams, to
extract money from the taxpayers to build them new stadiums.
At the same time that we’re
doing this, we are starving our public parks for money. And I show in Free
Lunch how the rise of urban gangs and now suburban gangs is connected to
this. We used to have all sorts of programs in this country after World War II
for young men and young women on Saturdays and during the summer and school
holidays, where even if you didn’t have any money—didn’t matter that your
parents didn’t have any money, because—and I know this because I did it as a
child—you could go to any one of a half-dozen different places, and there were
organized activities to keep you out of trouble. After all, idle hands are the
devil’s workshop is not exactly a radical new idea. Well, we’ve cut and cut and
cut those programs to fund two different subsidies: one to sports teams’ owners,
one that goes to Tyco, General Electric, Honeywell and some other big companies.
And, lo and behold, we’ve had a big rise in
urban violence because of the vacuum being filled by young people who no longer
have these organized activities.
Jan. 18
Must
see about the corporate media.
Jan. 15
Radical
cartoonist Peter Kuper has been living in Mexico for the past year and that's
one of the pages of his story. Again, if you can find the current
issue of World War
III, it's a fantastic read.
(yet again, sigh. On the other
hand, I would hope the Goddess would notice all those black politicians who are
helping with the screwing. The Goddess has endorsed Obama. I haven't, at least
not as my first choice. I've gotten to the point to where I kind of want to know
what your policies are, Tonya.)
--and the
vote recount begins in New Hampshire
where, at least, you can do a recount. One of the horrifying things I
learned from that New York Times magazine article is that Pennsylvania's
machines don't have the ability to record your ballot for a recount or at least
a separate paper ballot that you can use to verify your vote...In fact, I've
kind of wondered what state could be the Ohio or Florida of 2008 and it could
very easily be Pennsylvania. Horrifying.
Shooting
War, written by GNN founder Anthony Lappe, also has a trailer here:
Jan 10
More
Frazetta:
There
are a number of important election fraud stories that must be read. One is the
recent story in the New York Times Magazine. By the way, I hope that the Post
Gazette notices that this is now a respectable path of inquiry. So, you can now
pull Bill Moushey and Dennis Roddy off of whatever they're doing which is less
important (which, unless it involves confirmation of Roswell, would include just
about everything in the known galaxy...) and take a look at the election fraud
story and even take a whack at
rebutting this or even
this. That would be important too. Two: A
new piece
by the Free Press team of Fitrakis and Wasserman which ties together the people
who have pulled the greatest crime of our new century. Yes, there are CIA links
and more info about incredible primary combacks. I've seen that movie
before...wasn't it Tuesday?
I
gave the Edwards campaign a long shot Hail Mary way to come back, possibly. It's
crossposted at MYDD and Booman Tribune.
I think an excellent way for John
Edwards to cut through to democratic voters is to take a truly fighting stance
against "election fraud." There is some evidence that the kind of suspected
primary election fraud that the election fraud "community" (Bob Fitrakis of Free
Press, Black Box Voting, Mark Crispin Miller and others who are largely
unrebutted by the GOP) has noticed may have occurred in New Hampshire.(One.)
To summarize, it looks like exit
polling, which would be immune to unaccounted for pre polling surges and/or
skulldoggery by republican independents (and is reliable within .1 percent in
places like Germany), is wildly at odds with the final result. The election
fraud community smells a rat as well they should. Now, there is a counter view
posted at Dkos. (Two.) I don't find it as compelling as the chart shown here:
I think John Edwards should ask for a
full recount, but go a bit further and demand a full inquiry into "chain of
custody" issues. You might wonder what the overall benefit would be of a
successful recount effort which would give the election to Obama. Well, the most
important thing it would do is it would show, in a very realistic and powerful
way, that Edwards is a different kind of democrat who fights for principle,
namely one person one vote. Afterall, a lot of dems, myself included, think that
both the 2000 and the 2004 election were stolen. If you want to show me a
different kind of democrat you could start by fighting for our votes.
I'm also an African American. If you
wanted to sell other African Americans on your campaign you might remind those
African American voters (most targeted by vote suppression and these new ID
laws) who fought for their vote and who will be more likely to fight for their
vote when the Ohio/Florida of 2008 inevitably arises. The reason I support John
Edwards is that I think he'll do more for the black community than some
triangulating appeaser. Here's a chance for Edwards to prove me right.
You could also make your critiques of
the voting system while supporting the New Holt Bill and wondering aloud why
Sens. Obama and Clinton aren't more vocal or aren't offering amendments against
voter ID Laws. I just think it creates a new dynamic for the race. A man who
bills himself as a "fighting democrat" should, well, do some fighting...
Sincerely,
Philip Shropshire
www.threeriversonline.com
One: If you're interested in the details then look here:
I
don't think the Steelers will win tonight not because of talent level but way
too many injuries (Parker, Aaron Smith and Starks) but they're a great team and
can beat anybody for one game. Except probably the Pats this year. Anyway, Go
Stillers. Update halftime: Arrrrrrrgh! Big Ben sucks, this game
anyway or maybe we just don't match up well. We might come back although this is
forcing me to watch the debate, ever so judiciously timed against an NFL playoff
game. Obama is talking about the Iraqi Oil Law without mentioning that the Iraqi
Oil Law that we drew up
completely gives away Iraq's oil. As for Hillary, probably not my first or
second choice for the presidency and I can't see myself doing much work for her
other than voting but she is a very intelligent, very sexy woman who I
would like to "do" even though she's in her sixties who I personally
find appealing. Final Update: ARRRRRH Again. Welp the Steelers lost. They
played their hearts out though. Even if they had won I can't see them giving the
Pats a problem without their full roster. We'll get them next year. I also think
Jackonsonville will give the Pats a better game than a depleted Steelers.
Oh
fuck. They just called Obama articulate on CNN. It was cranky old Jack. Well
it least he wasn't impressed about how clean he was.
Looks
like my second choice Barack Obama has won the Iowa caucuses. Just a note to
my fellow Americans: Even if Obama wins the DNC nomination and wins the
presidential election, the United States would still be a fucking racist nation.
Just thought I should mention that here in a country that doesn't fund public
education like it funds wars against brown folks abroad, seems to be tracking
black males for the penal system and as of late throws entire black families into
jail for their droopy pants.... So please don't think it's all better now.
That is all as my favorite armored bear has said recently in the Golden Compass,
which I finally saw and which I thought was pretty good. More on
the Golden Compass here...
A
very late Happy New Year to everyone. It's about 9 pm when I write this and
they're calling it for Mike Huckabee. Oddly enough, I actually think he
represents your average hayseed racist loves the lord republican fairly
accurately. Or as someone called it, and I'm paraphrasing, he's the Revenge of
Gomer. Update: Watching CNN now and one of the talking heads says Mitt's
Mormonism cost him because evangelicals came out against him. Sounds about right
to me. Traditional Mormonism, started by a twice or thrice convicted con artist
if I remember the Hitchens quote right, simply isn't compatible with
Christianity.
It's completely up in the air on the dem
side. Edwards could win it all or fall to third. It's very close. I did some
volunteer calling for about 2 and a half hours Tuesday night for Edwards and
felt pretty good about all the people who were choosing Edwards as a second
choice. But I woke up this morning finding out that Richardson, with his 5 or 6
percent, was telling his voters to choose Obama and right now Obama is leading.
Again, I could work for Obama even though I'm not enthralled with his GOP
talking points campaign so far and I'm not sure if or how he would fight for the
interests of the common man. Think he would be great for the courts though and
the EEOC, where I currently have a case...
Booman, the Anti Kos, probably had the best
summary of why most of the blogosphere backs Edwards. I really think Edwards has
the best message and ironically he could even run against the DNC congress and
get away with it. Update: CNN calls it for Obama around 9:30.
Perhaps because his wife is such an avid reader of blogs, Edwards'
campaign tapped right into our zeitgeist. He came out with our insight front
and center. You want Edwards' message? Here it is: 'Fuck David Broder, fuck
Joe Klein, fuck Chris Matthews, fuck FOX News, fuck Tim Russert, fuck Mitch
McConnell, fuck Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Big Defense. We don't need them.
They won't negotiate in good faith. They're stacking the deck against us.
And we can beat them by telling the truth and getting organized.' That's
Edwards' message, and that is the message we have internalized both through
our successes and our failures.
What's funny is that Obama is saying many of the same things, in his
own way. The policy differences between Edwards and Obama are minimal. But
Obama's tone deaf to the blogosphere. And, as a result, the blogosphere
didn't trust him. Take
Armando:
...we do not criticize Obama's political style on aesthetic grounds;
we criticize his style because we think it will not work to actually
EFFECT CHANGE. We believe that despite his being touted as the change
candidate, his political style is the one LEAST likely to achieve
progressive policy change.
His 'style' will be ineffective. Why did so many of us conclude this?
It's because we have watched Tom Daschle, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi try
to negotiate with the Republicans (in the minority, the majority, no matter)
and it does not work. We have watched the Dems talk tough and then back down
time and time again. We're done with conciliation and we don't believe
bipartisanship is possible without first crushing the Republican Party down
to a stump.
There
was a public warning about how you could hack the Iowa caucus process from black
box voting. Read
about it here.